Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP)
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Medpace Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BKNG is classified in Consumer Cyclical; MEDP is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$173.92Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
$587.52HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BKNG vs MEDP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBKNG +208.2% (+11.9%/yr)MEDP +1860.2% (+34.7%/yr)MEDP compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BKNG MEDP
BKNG vs MEDP: by the numbers
- •BKNG is the larger company ($134.77B vs $16.40B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.29 vs 34.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (25.53% vs 17.67% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.52% vs 22.03% CAGR).
- •BKNG pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while MEDP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | MEDP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.29 | 34.42 |
| Forward P/E | 16.64 | 33.38 |
| P/S ratio | 4.77 | 5.89 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 37.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.30 | 26.20 |
| FCF yield | 7.08% | 4.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | MEDP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00% | 28.76% |
| Operating margin | 34.49% | 20.97% |
| Net margin | 25.53% | 17.67% |
| ROE | N/A | 113.29% |
| ROIC | 71.23% | 77.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | MEDP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 17.83% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | MEDP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 31.52% | 22.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62% | 30.90% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 56.15% | 23.40% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.07% | 24.92% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKNG or MEDP?
- BKNG has the lower trailing P/E: BKNG trades at 19.29 and MEDP at 34.42. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or MEDP?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 31.52% CAGR versus MEDP at 22.03%.
- Does BKNG or MEDP pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while MEDP has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BKNG or MEDP more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 25.53% versus MEDP at 17.67%.
- How have BKNG and MEDP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BKNG delivered 12.15% and MEDP delivered 34.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioMedpace P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldBooking ROEMedpace ROEBooking operating marginMedpace operating marginBooking revenue growthMedpace revenue growthBooking free cash flowMedpace free cash flow
Booking & Medpace appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.