Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD)
GILD leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$164.94Consumer Cyclical
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
$125.59Healthcare
Total return — BKNG vs GILD
growth of $100 · last 27yBKNG +896.0%GILD +8870.7%GILD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BKNG GILD
BKNG vs GILD: by the numbers
- •GILD is the larger company ($155.93B vs $127.81B market cap).
- •GILD trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.11 vs 21.75 P/E).
- •GILD converts more revenue to profit (30.99% vs 22.23% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.43% vs 3.07% CAGR).
- •GILD pays the higher dividend yield (1.91% vs 0.97%).
Which is better, BKNG or GILD?
Metric tally: BKNG 7 · GILD 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGILD(lower P/E)
GrowthBKNG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGILD(higher dividend yield)
QualityBKNG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.75 | 17.11● |
| Forward P/E | 13.38 | 13.00● |
| P/S ratio | 4.73● | 5.30 |
| P/B ratio | — | 6.70 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14 | 0.01● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.07 | 12.91● |
| FCF yield | 6.90%● | 6.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00%● | 79.35% |
| Operating margin | 34.28% | 38.26%● |
| Net margin | 22.23% | 30.99%● |
| ROE | -96.88% | 39.19%● |
| ROIC | 50.82%● | 21.53% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.91%● |
| Payout ratio | 24.14% | 35.09% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.43%● | 3.07% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62%● | 133.83% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 39.83%● | 3.30% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.81% | 17.06%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BKNG or GILD?
- It depends on your goal. value: GILD (lower P/E); growth: BKNG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GILD (higher dividend yield); quality: BKNG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GILD leads 9 to 7.
- Is BKNG or GILD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GILD is cheaper: BKNG trades at a 21.75 P/E and GILD at 17.11.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or GILD?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 37.43% CAGR versus GILD at 3.07%.
- Does BKNG or GILD pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG yields 0.97% and GILD yields 1.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKNG or GILD more profitable?
- GILD runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 22.23% versus GILD at 30.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, BKNG or GILD?
- Over the past 10-year, BKNG delivered the higher annualized total return — BKNG at 12.30% versus GILD at 7.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioGilead Sciences P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldGilead Sciences dividend yieldBooking ROEGilead Sciences ROEBooking operating marginGilead Sciences operating marginBooking revenue growthGilead Sciences revenue growthBooking free cash flowGilead Sciences free cash flow
Booking & Gilead Sciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.