Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD)
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BKNG is classified in Consumer Cyclical; GILD is classified in Healthcare. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$173.92Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
$143.72HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BKNG vs GILD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBKNG +204.8% (+11.8%/yr)GILD +161.3% (+10.1%/yr)BKNG compounded faster over this window
BKNG GILD
BKNG vs GILD: by the numbers
- •GILD is the larger company ($178.44B vs $134.77B market cap).
- •BKNG is profitable (25.53% net margin) while GILD runs a net loss (-10.64%).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.52% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •GILD pays the higher dividend yield (2.22% vs 0.92%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.29 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 16.64 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 4.77 | 5.86 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 15.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.30 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 7.08% | 7.27% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00% | 79.59% |
| Operating margin | 34.49% | 39.74% |
| Net margin | 25.53% | -10.64% |
| ROE | N/A | -27.39% |
| ROIC | 71.23% | -3.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | 2.22% |
| Payout ratio | 17.83% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 31.52% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62% | 133.83% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 56.15% | 9.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.07% | 19.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or GILD?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 31.52% CAGR versus GILD at 2.72%.
- Does BKNG or GILD pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG yields 0.92% and GILD yields 2.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKNG or GILD more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 25.53% versus GILD at -10.64%.
- How have BKNG and GILD total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BKNG delivered 12.15% and GILD delivered 10.21% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldGilead Sciences dividend yieldBooking ROEGilead Sciences ROEBooking operating marginGilead Sciences operating marginBooking revenue growthGilead Sciences revenue growthBooking free cash flowGilead Sciences free cash flow
Booking & Gilead Sciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.