Which has grown faster, BKNG or FT?

Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 31.52% CAGR versus FT at 0.42%.

Does BKNG or FT pay a bigger dividend?

BKNG yields 0.92% and FT yields 6.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BKNG or FT more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 25.53% versus FT at 100.92%.

How have BKNG and FT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BKNG delivered 12.15% and FT delivered 7.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Franklin Universal Trust (FT)

A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Franklin Universal Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: BKNG is classified in Consumer Cyclical; FT is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

BKNG

Booking Holdings Inc.

$134.77B

$173.92Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Franklin Universal Trust

$189M

$7.53Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BKNG vs FT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BKNG +204.8% (+11.8%/yr)FT +107.1% (+7.6%/yr)BKNG compounded faster over this window

BKNG FT

BKNG vs FT: by the numbers

•BKNG is the larger company ($134.77B vs $189M market cap).
•FT converts more revenue to profit (100.92% vs 25.53% net margin).
•BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.52% vs 0.42% CAGR).
•FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.75% vs 0.92%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BKNG	FT
P/E ratio	19.29	N/A
Forward P/E	16.64	N/A
P/S ratio	4.77	N/A
P/B ratio	N/A	0.83
EV / EBITDA	13.30	N/A
FCF yield	7.08%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	BKNG	FT
Gross margin	100.00%	87.35%
Operating margin	34.49%	119.92%
Net margin	25.53%	100.92%
ROE	N/A	9.04%
ROIC	71.23%	N/A

Dividends

Metric	BKNG	FT
Dividend yield	0.92%	6.75%
Payout ratio	17.83%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BKNG	FT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	31.52%	0.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	158.62%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	56.15%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.07%	4.71%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BKNG or FT?: Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 31.52% CAGR versus FT at 0.42%.
Does BKNG or FT pay a bigger dividend?: BKNG yields 0.92% and FT yields 6.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BKNG or FT more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 25.53% versus FT at 100.92%.
How have BKNG and FT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BKNG delivered 12.15% and FT delivered 7.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BKNG analysis Full FT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Booking P/E ratio Booking dividend yield Franklin Universal dividend yield Booking ROE Franklin Universal ROE Booking operating margin Franklin Universal operating margin Booking revenue growth Franklin Universal revenue growth Booking free cash flow

Booking & Franklin Universal appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.