Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS)
BKNG leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$164.94Consumer Cyclical
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
$384.96Technology
Total return — BKNG vs CDNS
growth of $100 · last 27yBKNG +896.0%CDNS +1439.8%CDNS compounded faster
BKNG CDNS
BKNG vs CDNS: by the numbers
- •BKNG is the larger company ($127.81B vs $106.18B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.75 vs 89.73 P/E).
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (22.23% vs 21.18% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.43% vs 14.78% CAGR).
- •BKNG pays a dividend (0.97% yield) while CDNS does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BKNG or CDNS?
Metric tally: BKNG 13 · CDNS 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBKNG(lower P/E)
GrowthBKNG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBKNG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.75● | 89.73 |
| Forward P/E | 13.38● | 41.13 |
| P/S ratio | 4.73● | 19.06 |
| P/B ratio | — | 16.06 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14● | 14.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.07● | 56.46 |
| FCF yield | 6.90%● | 1.36% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00%● | 88.85% |
| Operating margin | 34.28%● | 31.11% |
| Net margin | 22.23%● | 21.18% |
| ROE | -96.88% | 17.85%● |
| ROIC | 50.82%● | 14.11% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | — |
| Payout ratio | 24.14% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.43%● | 14.78% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62%● | 13.62% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 39.83%● | 11.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.81% | 24.38%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BKNG or CDNS?
- It depends on your goal. value: BKNG (lower P/E); growth: BKNG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BKNG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKNG leads 13 to 2.
- Is BKNG or CDNS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BKNG is cheaper: BKNG trades at a 21.75 P/E and CDNS at 89.73.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or CDNS?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 37.43% CAGR versus CDNS at 14.78%.
- Does BKNG or CDNS pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG pays a dividend (0.97% yield) while CDNS does not currently pay one.
- Is BKNG or CDNS more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 22.23% versus CDNS at 21.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, BKNG or CDNS?
- Over the past 10-year, CDNS delivered the higher annualized total return — BKNG at 12.30% versus CDNS at 31.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioCadence Design Systems P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldCadence Design Systems dividend yieldBooking ROECadence Design Systems ROEBooking operating marginCadence Design Systems operating marginBooking revenue growthCadence Design Systems revenue growthBooking free cash flowCadence Design Systems free cash flow
Booking & Cadence Design Systems appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.