Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) vs Lufax Holding Ltd (LU)
BIO leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and Lufax Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BIO vs LU
growth of $100 · last 6yBIO -51.2%LU -97.4%BIO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BIO LU
BIO vs LU: by the numbers
- •BIO is the larger company ($7.73B vs $558M market cap).
- •BIO is profitable (6.52% net margin) while LU runs a net loss (-10.59%).
- •BIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (-0.84% vs -6.44% CAGR).
Which is better, BIO or LU?
Metric tally: BIO 9 · LU 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthBIO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBIO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BIO | LU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 47.11 | — |
| Forward P/E | 28.69 | — |
| P/S ratio | 2.98 | 0.09● |
| P/B ratio | 1.13 | 0.05● |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.01● | 72.98 |
| FCF yield | 4.63% | 312.50%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BIO | LU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.87%● | 41.96% |
| Operating margin | 9.25%● | -4.31% |
| Net margin | 6.52%● | -10.59% |
| ROE | 2.46%● | -4.14% |
| ROIC | 2.04%● | -0.21% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BIO | LU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.84%● | -6.44% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -26.27%● | -43.16% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -7.57% | 24.09%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -13.82%● | -40.92% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BIO or LU?
- It depends on your goal. growth: BIO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BIO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BIO leads 9 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, BIO or LU?
- Over the past five years, BIO grew revenue faster — BIO at a -0.84% CAGR versus LU at -6.44%.
- Is BIO or LU more profitable?
- BIO runs the higher net margin — BIO at 6.52% versus LU at -10.59%.
- Which has been the better investment, BIO or LU?
- Over the past 5-year, BIO delivered the higher annualized total return — BIO at 6.91% versus LU at -40.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bio-Rad Laboratories P/E ratioLufax P/E ratioBio-Rad Laboratories dividend yieldLufax dividend yieldBio-Rad Laboratories ROELufax ROEBio-Rad Laboratories operating marginLufax operating marginBio-Rad Laboratories revenue growthLufax revenue growthBio-Rad Laboratories free cash flowLufax free cash flow
Bio-Rad Laboratories & Lufax appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.