Bank First Corporation (BFC) vs EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW)

A side-by-side comparison of Bank First Corporation and EZCORP, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — BFC vs EZPW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
BFC +484.4% (+19.3%/yr)EZPW +184.0% (+11.0%/yr)BFC compounded faster over this window
0200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$584$284
BFC EZPW

BFC vs EZPW: by the numbers

  • •EZPW is the larger company ($1.79B vs $1.70B market cap).
  • •EZPW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.56 vs 19.66 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •BFC converts more revenue to profit (27.80% vs 9.99% net margin).
  • •BFC grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.15% vs 17.62% CAGR).
  • •BFC pays a dividend (1.39% yield), while EZPW is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBFCEZPW
P/E ratio19.6615.56
Forward P/E15.2114.00
PEG ratio2.64N/A
P/S ratio5.821.13
P/B ratio2.071.53
EV / EBITDAN/A8.91
FCF yieldN/A7.86%

Profitability

MetricBFCEZPW
Gross marginN/A57.95%
Operating margin34.54%13.90%
Net margin27.80%9.99%
ROE9.89%13.59%
ROICN/A8.49%

Bank First Corporation: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

MetricBFCEZPW
Dividend yield1.39%N/A
Payout ratio27.31%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricBFCEZPW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)19.15%17.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)7.36%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A108.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.39%31.94%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BFC or EZPW?
EZPW has the lower trailing P/E: BFC trades at 19.66 and EZPW at 15.56. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BFC or EZPW?
Over the past five years, BFC grew revenue faster — BFC at a 19.15% CAGR versus EZPW at 17.62%.
Does BFC or EZPW pay a bigger dividend?
BFC pays a dividend (1.39% yield), while EZPW is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is BFC or EZPW more profitable?
BFC runs the higher net margin — BFC at 27.80% versus EZPW at 9.99%.
How have BFC and EZPW total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, BFC delivered 19.31% and EZPW delivered 10.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.