Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Truist Financial Corporation (TFC)
APO leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though TFC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Truist Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$51.66Financial Services
Total return — APO vs TFC
growth of $100 · last 15yAPO +657.4%TFC +84.1%APO compounded faster
APO TFC
APO vs TFC: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $63.42B market cap).
- •TFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.28 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •TFC converts more revenue to profit (18.14% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs 5.16% CAGR).
- •TFC pays the higher dividend yield (4.03% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, APO or TFC?
Metric tally: APO 8 · TFC 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTFC(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityAPO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.08 | 13.28● |
| Forward P/E | 14.99 | 11.37● |
| P/S ratio | 2.68 | 2.15● |
| P/B ratio | 3.99 | 1.02● |
| PEG ratio | 0.53● | 0.79 |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.33%● | 62.92% |
| Operating margin | 31.05%● | 21.35% |
| Net margin | 7.24% | 18.14%● |
| ROE | 10.78%● | 8.61% |
| ROIC | 7.24%● | 3.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 4.03%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.63% | 53.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | 5.16% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 75.44%● | 4.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.35%● | 2.52% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, APO or TFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: TFC (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TFC (higher dividend yield); quality: APO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 8 to 6.
- Is APO or TFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TFC is cheaper: APO trades at a 40.08 P/E and TFC at 13.28.
- Which has grown faster, APO or TFC?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 37.15% CAGR versus TFC at 5.16%.
- Does APO or TFC pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.56% and TFC yields 4.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or TFC more profitable?
- TFC runs the higher net margin — APO at 7.24% versus TFC at 18.14%.
- Which has been the better investment, APO or TFC?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — APO at 29.59% versus TFC at 7.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioTruist Financial P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldTruist Financial dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROETruist Financial ROEApollo Global Management operating marginTruist Financial operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthTruist Financial revenue growthApollo Global Management free cash flowTruist Financial free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Truist Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.