Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) vs Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG)
A side-by-side comparison of Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Booking Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: APO is classified in Financial Services; BKNG is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$128.98Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$173.92Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — APO vs BKNG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yAPO +909.5% (+26.0%/yr)BKNG +208.2% (+11.9%/yr)APO compounded faster over this window
APO BKNG
APO vs BKNG: by the numbers
- •BKNG is the larger company ($134.77B vs $74.29B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.29 vs 28.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (25.53% vs 5.22% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (43.10% vs 31.52% CAGR).
- •APO pays the higher dividend yield (1.68% vs 0.92%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | APO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.85 | 19.29 |
| Forward P/E | 14.71 | 16.64 |
| P/S ratio | 2.07 | 4.77 |
| P/B ratio | 3.54 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 13.30 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 7.08% |
Profitability
| Metric | APO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 95.50% | 100.00% |
| Operating margin | 24.13% | 34.49% |
| Net margin | 5.22% | 25.53% |
| ROE | 8.93% | N/A |
| ROIC | N/A | 71.23% |
Dividends
| Metric | APO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | 47.99% | 17.83% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | APO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 43.10% | 31.52% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 66.21% | 158.62% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 56.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.36% | 14.07% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, APO or BKNG?
- BKNG has the lower trailing P/E: APO trades at 28.85 and BKNG at 19.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, APO or BKNG?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — APO at a 43.10% CAGR versus BKNG at 31.52%.
- Does APO or BKNG pay a bigger dividend?
- APO yields 1.68% and BKNG yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is APO or BKNG more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — APO at 5.22% versus BKNG at 25.53%.
- How have APO and BKNG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, APO delivered 26.21% and BKNG delivered 12.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apollo Global Management P/E ratioBooking P/E ratioApollo Global Management dividend yieldBooking dividend yieldApollo Global Management ROEBooking ROEApollo Global Management operating marginBooking operating marginApollo Global Management revenue growthBooking revenue growthBooking free cash flow
Apollo Global Management & Booking appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.