Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. (AP) vs Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX)
PSIX leads on 11 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. and Power Solutions International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AP
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.
$9.35Industrials
PSIX
Power Solutions International, Inc.
$37.99Industrials
Total return — AP vs PSIX
growth of $100 · last 14yAP -52.3%PSIX +105.5%PSIX compounded faster
AP PSIX
AP vs PSIX: by the numbers
- •PSIX is the larger company ($876M vs $190M market cap).
- •PSIX is profitable (14.28% net margin) while AP runs a net loss (-15.53%).
- •PSIX grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.64% vs 6.21% CAGR).
Which is better, AP or PSIX?
Metric tally: AP 1 · PSIX 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthPSIX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPSIX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AP | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 8.56 |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.96 |
| P/S ratio | 0.43● | 1.22 |
| P/B ratio | 6.04 | 4.72● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.55 | 9.72● |
| FCF yield | — | 2.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | AP | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 14.54% | 24.16%● |
| Operating margin | 0.17% | 13.48%● |
| Net margin | -15.53% | 14.28%● |
| ROE | -217.33% | 55.01%● |
| ROIC | 1.59% | 30.51%● |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AP | PSIX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.21% | 11.64%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.91% | 53.38%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -46.19% | 8.05%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 8.81% | 46.63%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AP or PSIX?
- It depends on your goal. growth: PSIX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PSIX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PSIX leads 11 to 1.
- Which has grown faster, AP or PSIX?
- Over the past five years, PSIX grew revenue faster — AP at a 6.21% CAGR versus PSIX at 11.64%.
- Is AP or PSIX more profitable?
- PSIX runs the higher net margin — AP at -15.53% versus PSIX at 14.28%.
- Which has been the better investment, AP or PSIX?
- Over the past 10-year, PSIX delivered the higher annualized total return — AP at -2.09% versus PSIX at 7.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ampco-Pittsburgh P/E ratioPower Solutions International P/E ratioAmpco-Pittsburgh dividend yieldPower Solutions International dividend yieldAmpco-Pittsburgh ROEPower Solutions International ROEAmpco-Pittsburgh operating marginPower Solutions International operating marginAmpco-Pittsburgh revenue growthPower Solutions International revenue growthAmpco-Pittsburgh free cash flowPower Solutions International free cash flow
Ampco-Pittsburgh & Power Solutions International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.