Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) vs T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)
TMUS leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Amazon.com, Inc. and T-Mobile US, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
$238.55Consumer Cyclical
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
$189.10Communication Services
Total return — AMZN vs TMUS
growth of $100 · last 19yAMZN +10597.3%TMUS +245.1%AMZN compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMZN TMUS
AMZN vs TMUS: by the numbers
- •AMZN is the larger company ($2.57T vs $204.64B market cap).
- •TMUS trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.12 vs 28.53 P/E).
- •AMZN converts more revenue to profit (12.22% vs 11.65% net margin).
- •AMZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.13% vs 3.28% CAGR).
- •TMUS pays a dividend (2.08% yield) while AMZN does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AMZN or TMUS?
Metric tally: AMZN 6 · TMUS 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTMUS(lower P/E)
GrowthAMZN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAMZN(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AMZN | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.53 | 20.12● |
| Forward P/E | 23.71 | 13.93● |
| P/S ratio | 3.49 | 2.30● |
| P/B ratio | 5.87 | 3.73● |
| PEG ratio | 1.10● | 40.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.34 | 11.58● |
| FCF yield | — | 8.73% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMZN | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.60% | 54.34%● |
| Operating margin | 11.50% | 20.36%● |
| Net margin | 12.22%● | 11.65% |
| ROE | 20.55%● | 18.87% |
| ROIC | 10.70%● | 7.04% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMZN | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.08% |
| Payout ratio | — | 40.41% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMZN | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.13%● | 3.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.90% | 29.48%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.57% | 45.55%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.35%● | 6.34% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMZN or TMUS?
- It depends on your goal. value: TMUS (lower P/E); growth: AMZN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AMZN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TMUS leads 9 to 6.
- Is AMZN or TMUS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TMUS is cheaper: AMZN trades at a 28.53 P/E and TMUS at 20.12.
- Which has grown faster, AMZN or TMUS?
- Over the past five years, AMZN grew revenue faster — AMZN at a 12.13% CAGR versus TMUS at 3.28%.
- Does AMZN or TMUS pay a bigger dividend?
- TMUS pays a dividend (2.08% yield) while AMZN does not currently pay one.
- Is AMZN or TMUS more profitable?
- AMZN runs the higher net margin — AMZN at 12.22% versus TMUS at 11.65%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMZN or TMUS?
- Over the past 10-year, AMZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AMZN at 20.84% versus TMUS at 16.76%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amazon.com P/E ratioT-Mobile US P/E ratioAmazon.com dividend yieldT-Mobile US dividend yieldAmazon.com ROET-Mobile US ROEAmazon.com operating marginT-Mobile US operating marginAmazon.com revenue growthT-Mobile US revenue growthAmazon.com free cash flowT-Mobile US free cash flow
Amazon.com & T-Mobile US appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield StocksHighest FCF Yield StocksBest 10-Year Total Return StocksLargest Companies by Market Cap
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.