Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGLN) vs M&T Bank Corporation (MTB)

A side-by-side comparison of Arch Capital Group Ltd. and M&T Bank Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ACGLN vs MTB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
ACGLN -17.2% (-3.7%/yr)MTB +58.4% (+9.6%/yr)MTB compounded faster over this window
100150Start $10020222023202420252026$83$158
ACGLN MTB

ACGLN vs MTB: by the numbers

  • •ACGLN is the larger company ($32.39B vs $31.64B market cap).
  • •ACGLN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (1.19 vs 11.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •ACGLN grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.36% vs 15.23% CAGR).
  • •ACGLN pays the higher dividend yield (7.55% vs 2.75%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricACGLNMTB
P/E ratio1.1911.51
Forward P/E1.6111.30
PEG ratio0.041.02
P/S ratio1.692.55
P/B ratio1.401.24

Profitability

MetricACGLNMTB
Operating margin27.38%33.19%
Net margin24.44%24.40%
ROE19.53%10.85%

Arch Capital Group Ltd.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

M&T Bank Corporation: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

MetricACGLNMTB
Dividend yield7.55%2.75%
Payout ratio8.89%31.65%

Growth (annualized)

MetricACGLNMTB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)16.36%15.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)28.50%11.33%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-4.65%10.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ACGLN or MTB?
ACGLN has the lower trailing P/E: ACGLN trades at 1.19 and MTB at 11.51. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ACGLN or MTB?
Over the past five years, ACGLN grew revenue faster — ACGLN at a 16.36% CAGR versus MTB at 15.23%.
Does ACGLN or MTB pay a bigger dividend?
ACGLN yields 7.55% and MTB yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
How have ACGLN and MTB total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, ACGLN delivered -4.65% and MTB delivered 10.68% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.