Which has grown faster, ABTC or HIFS?

Over the past five years, ABTC grew revenue faster — ABTC at a 74.61% CAGR versus HIFS at 14.19%.

Does ABTC or HIFS pay a bigger dividend?

HIFS pays a dividend (1.13% yield), while ABTC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ABTC or HIFS more profitable?

HIFS runs the higher net margin — ABTC at -71.75% versus HIFS at 27.02%.

How have ABTC and HIFS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ABTC delivered -84.01% and HIFS delivered -3.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

American Bitcoin Corp (ABTC) vs Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS)

A side-by-side comparison of American Bitcoin Corp and Hingham Institution for Savings across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ABTC

American Bitcoin Corp

$622M

$8.54Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT

HIFS

Hingham Institution for Savings

$615M

$282.07Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT

Total return — ABTC vs HIFS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

ABTC -100.0% (-68.5%/yr)HIFS +53.1% (+4.8%/yr)HIFS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ABTC HIFS

ABTC vs HIFS: by the numbers

•ABTC is the larger company ($622M vs $615M market cap).
•HIFS is profitable (27.02% net margin) while ABTC runs a net loss (-71.75%).
•ABTC grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.61% vs 14.19% CAGR).
•HIFS pays a dividend (1.13% yield), while ABTC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ABTC	HIFS
P/E ratio	N/A	9.40
PEG ratio	N/A	7.46
P/S ratio	2.29	2.51
P/B ratio	0.93	1.21

Profitability

Metric	ABTC	HIFS
Gross margin	47.06%	N/A
Operating margin	-123.13%	35.75%
Net margin	-71.75%	27.02%
ROE	-29.00%	13.07%

Hingham Institution for Savings: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	ABTC	HIFS
Dividend yield	N/A	1.13%
Payout ratio	N/A	10.73%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ABTC	HIFS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	74.61%	14.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	1.03%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-84.01%	-3.11%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ABTC or HIFS?: Over the past five years, ABTC grew revenue faster — ABTC at a 74.61% CAGR versus HIFS at 14.19%.
Does ABTC or HIFS pay a bigger dividend?: HIFS pays a dividend (1.13% yield), while ABTC has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ABTC or HIFS more profitable?: HIFS runs the higher net margin — ABTC at -71.75% versus HIFS at 27.02%.
How have ABTC and HIFS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ABTC delivered -84.01% and HIFS delivered -3.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ABTC analysis Full HIFS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hingham Institution for Savings P/E ratio Hingham Institution for Savings dividend yield American Bitcoin ROE Hingham Institution for Savings ROE American Bitcoin operating margin Hingham Institution for Savings operating margin American Bitcoin revenue growth Hingham Institution for Savings revenue growth

American Bitcoin & Hingham Institution for Savings appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.