Basis: Latest reported fiscal quarter. Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
The FCF payout ratio is N/A as of the fiscal period ended Friday, March 31, 2017.
Rolling trailing-12-month FCF payout ratio sampled each quarter; raw quarterly payout is intentionally not charted. Q1 FY2017 (2017-03-31): 630.08%.
FCF PAYOUT RATIO
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG TTM
355.95%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 3Y
327.75%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 5Y
221.51%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 10Y
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 15Y
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 20Y
N/A
CURRENT VS TTM AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 3Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 5Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 10Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 15Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 20Y AVG
N/A
FCF Payout Ratio TTM
N/A
Earnings Payout Ratio
55.3%
Dividend Yield
3.79%
FCF Yield
N/A
| Year | Free Cash Flow | Dividends Paid | FCF Payout Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ($18.50M) | $12.68M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2024 | ($9.12M) | $12.17M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2023 | ($30.33M) | $11.24M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2022 | ($24.22M) | $10.32M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2021 | ($9.50M) | $9.83M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2020 | ($13.92M) |
Formula: FCF Payout Ratio TTM = trailing 4Q dividends paid / trailing 4Q free cash flow × 100
FCF payout and earnings payout:
Reading the series: Use the chart and table to compare dividend payments with cash generation over time.
FCF Payout Ratio measures trailing dividends paid as a percentage of trailing free cash flow. Unlike earnings-based payout, it compares dividends with cash generated after capital expenditures.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute
| DATE | FCF PAYOUT RATIO |
|---|---|
| 2017-03-31 | 630.08% |
| 2016-12-31 | 535.34% |
| 2016-09-30 | 241.53% |
| 2016-06-30 | 238.82% |
| 2016-03-31 | 133.99% |
| 2015-12-31 | 102.90% |
| 2015-09-30 | 251.64% |
| 2014-03-31 | 487.68% |
| 2012-12-31 | 242.31% |
| 2012-09-30 | 179.82% |
| 2012-06-30 | 191.49% |
| 2012-03-31 | 144.90% |
| 2011-12-31 | 180.23% |
| 2010-09-30 | 239.14% |
| 2010-06-30 | 244.56% |
| $9.38M |
| N/A (Loss) |
| 2019 | ($21.81M) | $9.12M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2018 | ($19.91M) | $8.82M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2017 | ($5.32M) | $8.50M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2016 | $1.53M | $8.18M | 535.3% |
| 2015 | $7.59M | $7.81M | 102.9% |
| 2014 | ($5.38M) | $7.52M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2013 | ($0.17M) | $7.21M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2012 | $2.83M | $6.85M | 242.3% |
| 2011 | $3.44M | $6.19M | 180.2% |
| 2010 | ($1.52M) | $5.68M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2009 | ($4.01M) | $5.38M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2008 | ($26.88M) | $5.19M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2007 | ($15.11M) | $4.46M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2006 | ($18.17M) | $3.71M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2005 | ($6.29M) | $3.47M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2004 | ($17.16M) | $3.27M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2003 | ($10.46M) | $3.18M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2002 | ($15.65M) | $2.72M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2001 | ($12.45M) | $2.30M | N/A (Loss) |
| 2000 | ($10.41M) | $2.26M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1999 | ($7.80M) | $2.20M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1998 | ($6.90M) | $1.80M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1997 | ($7.10M) | $1.70M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1996 | ($3.80M) | $1.40M | N/A (Loss) |
