Basis: Latest reported fiscal quarter. Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
Is the debt to assets ratio high or low?
The debt to assets ratio of 90.31% is in line with its 5-year average of 94.59%, around the middle of its 5-year range (81.76%–100.45%).
As of the fiscal period ended Tuesday, June 30, 2026. 6.72% below its 12-month average of 96.82%.
Reported quarterly debt to assets ratio; no daily interpolation. Q2 FY2026 (2026-06-30): 90.31%.
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO
90.31%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG TTM
96.82%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 3Y
96.10%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 5Y
94.59%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 10Y
85.52%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 15Y
75.13%
DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO AVG 20Y
66.78%
CURRENT VS TTM AVG
-6.72%
CURRENT VS 3Y AVG
-6.02%
CURRENT VS 5Y AVG
-4.52%
CURRENT VS 10Y AVG
+5.60%
CURRENT VS 15Y AVG
+20.21%
CURRENT VS 20Y AVG
+35.25%
SECTOR MEDIAN · ENERGY
0.21%
median of 98 covered companies
CURRENT VS SECTOR MEDIAN
+43955.29%
vs the sector median at left
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
Market Cap
$79.49M
Debt to Assets Ratio
90.31%
TTM Avg
96.82%
3Y Avg
96.10%
5Y Avg
94.59%
Market Cap
$78.14M
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.05%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$76.91M
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.09%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$84.46M
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.36%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$85.39M
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.35%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$64.00M
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.15%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$60.73M
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.01%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$38.22M
Debt to Assets Ratio
0.48%
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
| NAME | MARKET CAP | DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO | TTM | 3Y | 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (MMLP) | $79.49M | 90.31% | 96.82% | 96.10% | 94.59% |
| Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (LSE)vs › | $78.14M | 0.05% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Big Sky Industrial Inc. (BSIN)vs › | $76.91M | 0.09% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN)vs › | $84.46M | 0.36% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Drilling Tools International Corp. (DTI)vs › | $85.39M | 0.35% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Anfield Energy Inc. Common Shares (AEC)vs › | $64.00M | 0.15% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS)vs › | $60.73M | 0.01% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA)vs › | $110.54M | 0.00% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Prairie Operating Co. (PROP)vs › | $38.22M | 0.48% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DMC Global Inc. (BOOM)vs › | $122.83M | 0.09% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Debt/Assets
90.3%
Debt/Equity
N/A
Current Ratio
1.21
Interest Coverage
0.8x
Formula: Debt/Assets = Total Debt / Total Assets × 100
Debt/Assets vs Debt/Equity:
Industry context matters: Capital-intensive industries (utilities, real estate) typically have higher Debt/Assets ratios than tech companies.
Debt/Assets ratio shows what percentage of a company's assets are financed by debt. Compare the current value with the historical chart and peer group to understand leverage over time.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute
| DATE | DEBT TO ASSETS RATIO |
|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 90.31% |
| 2026-03-31 | 97.99% |
| 2025-12-31 | 100.45% |
| 2025-09-30 | 99.76% |
| 2025-06-30 | 95.60% |
| 2025-03-31 | 97.58% |
| 2024-12-31 | 93.82% |
| 2024-09-30 | 95.74% |
| 2024-06-30 | 94.09% |
| 2024-03-31 | 95.39% |
| 2023-12-31 | 94.58% |
| 2023-09-30 | 98.09% |
| 2023-06-30 | 95.85% |
| 2023-03-31 | 94.52% |
| 2022-12-31 | 91.55% |
| 2022-09-30 | 91.95% |
| 2022-06-30 | 81.76% |
| 2022-03-31 | 88.66% |
| 2021-12-31 | 89.98% |
| 2021-09-30 | 92.66% |
| 2021-06-30 | 93.28% |
| 2021-03-31 | 93.91% |
| 2020-12-31 | 93.01% |
| 2020-09-30 | 95.31% |
| 2020-06-30 | 92.44% |
| 2020-03-31 | 91.71% |
| 2019-12-31 | 90.18% |
| 2019-09-30 | 92.79% |
| 2019-06-30 | 90.33% |
| 2019-03-31 | 75.55% |
| 2018-12-31 | 64.65% |
| 2018-09-30 | 63.46% |
| 2018-06-30 | 68.26% |
| 2018-03-31 | 65.66% |
| 2017-12-31 | 64.83% |
| 2017-09-30 | 66.50% |
| 2017-06-30 | 63.62% |
| 2017-03-31 | 62.09% |
| 2016-12-31 | 64.84% |
| 2016-09-30 | 68.15% |
| 2016-06-30 | 65.50% |
| 2016-03-31 | 65.05% |
| 2015-12-31 | 62.66% |
| 2015-09-30 | 62.54% |
| 2015-06-30 | 59.52% |
| 2015-03-31 | 59.31% |
| 2014-12-31 | 58.05% |
| 2014-09-30 | 57.28% |
| 2014-06-30 | 55.34% |
| 2014-03-31 | 60.30% |
| 2013-12-31 | 59.99% |
| 2013-09-30 | 58.13% |
| 2013-06-30 | 53.80% |
| 2013-03-31 | 50.48% |
| 2012-12-31 | 47.21% |
| 2012-09-30 | 31.10% |
| 2012-06-30 | 46.87% |
| 2012-03-31 | 44.84% |
| 2011-12-31 | 48.49% |
| 2011-09-30 | 47.67% |
| 2011-06-30 | 47.83% |
| 2011-03-31 | 41.91% |
| 2010-12-31 | 47.61% |
| 2010-09-30 | 43.93% |
| 2010-06-30 | 42.30% |
| 2010-03-31 | 41.58% |
| 2009-12-31 | 44.39% |
| 2009-09-30 | 47.59% |
| 2009-06-30 | 46.92% |
| 2009-03-31 | 45.89% |
| 2008-12-31 | 44.10% |
| 2008-09-30 | 37.21% |
| 2008-06-30 | 36.19% |
| 2008-03-31 | 39.68% |
| 2007-12-31 | 36.09% |
| 2007-09-30 | 37.49% |
| 2007-06-30 | 34.94% |
| 2007-03-31 | 41.29% |
| 2006-12-31 | 38.06% |
| 2006-09-30 | 41.69% |
| 2006-06-30 | 37.26% |
| 2006-03-31 | 35.14% |
| 2005-12-31 | 52.18% |
| 2005-09-30 | 47.76% |
| 2005-06-30 | 39.99% |
| 2005-03-31 | 40.92% |
| 2004-12-31 | 39.46% |
| 2004-09-30 | 39.98% |
| 2004-06-30 | 36.47% |
| 2004-03-31 | 26.78% |
| 2003-12-31 | 47.97% |
| 2003-09-30 | 33.89% |
| 2003-06-30 | 34.23% |
| 2003-03-31 | 35.42% |
| 2002-12-31 | 34.84% |
| 2002-09-30 | 45.06% |
