Basis: Four-quarter operating EBITDA / current FMP quote-based enterprise value × 100. Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
The EBITDA yield is N/A as of 2026-10-03T22:38:40.643Z.
Calculation as of: 2026-10-03T22:38:40.643Z.
Quote observation: 2026-10-02T20:00:01.000Z. Amounts in USD. The price header may show a later quote.
FMP input reference: 4fb8bb97d38e53052a812c29ab2c938ec257e2913d653c2cfeece85ec6002c59
Historical values estimate market capitalization from statement-period weighted shares. Comparisons with the current quote-based value are approximate. Only filing versions delivered by FMP are available for the historical calculation.
EBITDA YIELD
N/A
Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
Market Cap
$269.14M
EBITDA Yield
N/A
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$148.13M
EBITDA Yield
6597.68%
TTM Avg
7623.49%
3Y Avg
7593.36%
5Y Avg
5082.46%
Market Cap
$449.45M
EBITDA Yield
N/A
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
Market Cap
$16.08M
EBITDA Yield
N/A
TTM Avg
N/A
3Y Avg
N/A
5Y Avg
N/A
| NAME | MARKET CAP | EBITDA YIELD | TTM | 3Y | 5Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) | $269.14M | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS)vs › | $214.50M | N/A | 3.86% | 3.84% | 3.87% |
| SEALSQ Corp (LAES)vs › | $337.95M | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM)vs › | $343.13M | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA)vs › | $148.13M | 6597.68% | 7623.49% | 7593.36% | 5082.46% |
| BTQ Technologies Corp. Common Stock (BTQ)vs › | $449.45M | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS)vs › | $34.56M | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Intelligent Protection Management Corp. (IPM)vs › | $16.08M | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Q/C Technologies, Inc. (QCLS)vs › | $6.13M | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI)vs › | $558.33M | 8.10% | 6.71% | 5.86% | 7.95% |
EBITDA Yield = TTM EBITDA / Enterprise Value
EBITDA yield is the inverse of EV/EBITDA, expressing trailing pre-interest, pre-tax operating cash generation as a percentage of enterprise value. Comparable across leverage levels; higher is cheaper. Not meaningful for banks and insurers.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute