Basis: Latest reported fiscal quarter. Source: stored company filings and market data; unavailable inputs remain N/A.
The FCF payout ratio is N/A as of the fiscal period ended Monday, September 30, 2013.
Rolling trailing-12-month FCF payout ratio sampled each quarter; raw quarterly payout is intentionally not charted. Q3 FY2013 (2013-09-30): 59.70%.
FCF PAYOUT RATIO
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG TTM
59.08%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 3Y
59.08%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 5Y
59.08%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 10Y
27.45%
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 15Y
N/A
FCF PAYOUT RATIO AVG 20Y
N/A
CURRENT VS TTM AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 3Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 5Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 10Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 15Y AVG
N/A
CURRENT VS 20Y AVG
N/A
FCF Payout Ratio TTM
N/A
Earnings Payout Ratio
N/A
Dividend Yield
N/A
FCF Yield
4.10%
| Year | Free Cash Flow | Dividends Paid | FCF Payout Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $84.80M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2024 | ($106.90M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2023 | $10.60M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2022 | ($60.40M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2021 | ($147.70M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2020 | $29.50M | $0 |
Formula: FCF Payout Ratio TTM = trailing 4Q dividends paid / trailing 4Q free cash flow × 100
FCF payout and earnings payout:
Reading the series: Use the chart and table to compare dividend payments with cash generation over time.
FCF Payout Ratio measures trailing dividends paid as a percentage of trailing free cash flow. Unlike earnings-based payout, it compares dividends with cash generated after capital expenditures.
Expanded definitions: Investopedia, Wikipedia, Corporate Finance Institute
| DATE | FCF PAYOUT RATIO |
|---|---|
| 2013-09-30 | 59.70% |
| 2013-06-30 | 19.32% |
| 2013-03-31 | 40.05% |
| 2012-12-31 | 117.25% |
| 2005-06-30 | 3.38% |
| 2005-03-31 | 3.67% |
| 2004-12-31 | 3.66% |
| 2003-12-31 | 0.02% |
| 2003-09-30 | 0.02% |
| 2003-06-30 | 3.08% |
| 0.0% |
| 2019 | ($41.90M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2018 | ($152.10M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2017 | $15.97M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2016 | $16.23M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2015 | ($22.83M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2014 | $141.62M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2013 | ($45.03M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2012 | $5.65M | $6.62M | 117.2% |
| 2011 | ($23.04M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2010 | $119.27M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2009 | $22.46M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2008 | ($709.97M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2007 | ($30.00M) | $0 | N/A (Loss) |
| 2006 | $161.75M | $0 | 0.0% |
| 2005 | $116.91M | $0.02M | 0.0% |
| 2004 | $90.59M | $3.31M | 3.7% |
| 2003 | $68.52M | $0.01M | 0.0% |
| 2002 | $36.06M | $4.59M | 12.7% |
| 2001 | $24.17M | $5.74M | 23.7% |
| 2000 | ($54.26M) | $4.17M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1999 | ($67.20M) | $4.10M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1998 | ($26.10M) | $4.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1997 | ($30.70M) | $4.00M | N/A (Loss) |
| 1996 | ($12.20M) | $3.00M | N/A (Loss) |