Is CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) Fairly Valued?

CoStar Group, Inc. valuation review using P/E, fair value, revenue growth, EPS growth, net margin, and TGMCharts chart exhibits as of October 2, 2026.

By TGMCharts Research · Data as of · Updated

Share

CoStar Group, Inc. does not get a one-metric verdict. The stock trades at 149.13x trailing earnings and the analyst DCF (FMP) reference is $20.81, so the valuation read depends on whether growth and margins support that price.

The core evidence is the relationship between price, earnings, fair value, and business support. Five-year revenue CAGR is 14.49%, five-year EPS CAGR is -51.09%, and net margin is 2.08%. Those facts decide whether the multiple is defensible or stretched.

  • CoStar Group, Inc. closed at $27.38 on October 2, 2026.
  • Trailing P/E is 149.13x and price-to-sales is 3.12x.
  • Analyst DCF (FMP) is $20.81 with margin of safety at -23.99%.
  • Five-year revenue CAGR is 14.49% and five-year EPS CAGR is -51.09%.
  • Earnings yield is 0.67% and net margin is 2.08%.

Valuation Setup

The market price, model anchor, growth support, and profitability facts behind the valuation read.

Latest close
$27.38
Trailing P/E
149.13x
Price to sales
3.12x
Analyst DCF (FMP)
$20.81
Margin of safety
-23.99%
5Y EPS CAGR
-51.09%

The Read

CoStar Group, Inc. should be read as a valuation question with a specific burden of proof: does the market price have enough earnings, growth, and margin support to justify the multiple? The stock closed at $27.38 on October 2, 2026, trades at 149.13x trailing earnings, and shows an analyst-DCF (FMP) margin of safety of -23.99% — an independent reference, not a TGMCharts model output.

The answer cannot come from one ratio. This note treats P/E, fair value, price-to-sales, earnings yield, revenue growth, EPS growth, and margin quality as a linked evidence set. If those lines reinforce each other, the valuation can be defended with more confidence; if they split, the final read has to stay cautious.

Current compounder snapshot · CSGP

Live supporting context; not part of the article's frozen 2026-10-02 evidence snapshot.

Score
34/100
10Y CAGR
16.4%
Median YoY
15.5%
YoY volatility
σ 4.4pp· very smooth
Quarters ≥ 20%
9 of 40
Negative quarters
0
Valuation vs own 10Y history
P/S 3.1x · 10Y median 13.5x · 2nd percentile · as of Oct 2, 2026
How this score is computed
  • Quarters at or above 20%: 9 of 40 → 9 of 40 pts
  • Steadiness (typical swing 4.4pp) → 21.9 of 25 pts
  • Pace (median 15.5% YoY) → 0.7 of 20 pts
  • Latest quarter (18.4% YoY) → 2.5 of 15 pts
  • Score: 34 of 100

Annualized revenue (TTM) · by quarter, last 40

$0.00$1.00B$2.00B$3.00B$4.00B20172019202120232025

Quarterly YoY revenue growth vs the 20% line

0%5%10%15%20%25%30%20%20172019202120232025

P/S multiple vs its 10Y median

0x5x10x15x20x25x10Y median 13.5x20172019202120232025

CSGP compounder charts →All consistent compounders →

Price And Multiple Context

The price and multiple section asks what the market is paying before judging whether that price is justified. Price-to-sales is 3.12x and earnings yield is 0.67%, so the first chart group keeps the market price, P/E history, and sales multiple in the same frame rather than treating the headline P/E as the whole story.

P/E ratio

CSGP P/E ratio Chart

149.13x

The trailing earnings multiple is the main valuation exhibit because it connects the market price to reported earnings. Historical series through 2026-10-02.

+2.73% over 5Y

Latest P/E ratio: 149.13x as of October 2, 2026.

A P/E ratio of 149.13x has to be judged against the company's five-year EPS CAGR of -51.09%. If the multiple is high while EPS support is ordinary, the valuation thesis becomes more dependent on investor confidence than on fresh earnings power.

price-to-sales

CSGP price-to-sales Chart

3.11x

Price-to-sales gives a second valuation lens when margins and earnings can move around the cycle. Historical values estimate market capitalization from statement-period weighted shares. Comparisons with the current quote-based value are approximate. Only filing versions delivered by FMP are available for the historical calculation. Historical series through 2026-10-02.

-83.37% over 5Y

Data through 2026-10-02. Historical values estimate market capitalization from statement-period weighted shares. Comparisons with the current quote-based value are approximate. Only filing versions delivered by FMP are available for the historical calculation.

Price-to-sales at 3.12x is most useful beside net margin of 2.08%. A richer sales multiple is easier to defend when margin quality is durable rather than temporarily elevated.

Fair Value And Margin Of Safety

The fair-value section is a reference point beside the market multiple. The stored fair value comes from the analyst DCF (FMP) — an independent third-party model, not a TGMCharts output — at $20.81, with a margin of safety of -23.99%. Treat it as one input rather than a verdict: see the CoStar Group, Inc. DCF page for TGMCharts' own scenario range, which can differ materially.

The valuation at a glance

Each input on its own line: what the stock costs against earnings and sales, the model's fair value and how far price sits from it, and the growth and margins behind the business.

Price-to-earnings (P/E)

Value
149.13x

Earnings yield

Value
0.67%

Analyst DCF (FMP)

Value
$20.81

Margin of safety vs analyst DCF (FMP)

Value
-23.99%

Revenue growth, five-year

Value
14.49%

EPS growth, five-year

Value
-51.09%

Net profit margin

Value
2.08%

Price-to-sales (P/S)

Value
3.12x
earnings yield

CSGP earnings yield Chart

0.67%

Earnings yield reframes valuation from an owner's-yield perspective rather than a multiple perspective. Historical series through 2026-10-02.

-0.0pp over 5Y

Latest earnings yield: 0.67%.

The earnings yield of 0.67% is the counterweight to the P/E ratio. If the yield is thin relative to the quality and growth profile, the valuation case needs more help from future compounding.

Growth Support

Growth support has to show up in both the top line and the per-share outcome. Five-year revenue CAGR is 14.49% and five-year EPS CAGR is -51.09%. The revenue and EPS exhibits sit here because this is where the valuation note decides whether the multiple is being supported by actual business expansion or mainly by investor willingness to pay more.

revenue

CSGP revenue

$925.00M

Revenue history tests whether the valuation is being supported by real business expansion. Q2 FY2026 (2026-06-30): $925.00M.

+334.86% over 10Y

Five-year revenue CAGR: 14.49%. This is endpoint-to-endpoint across the five-year window — a depressed start year can inflate it, so read it against the recent bars.

Revenue growth is the business-expansion evidence behind the valuation read. A five-year revenue CAGR of 14.49% helps show how much of the valuation story is coming from company growth instead of only multiple expansion.

EPS

CSGP EPS

$0.14

EPS history checks whether reported earnings are keeping pace with the market multiple. Q2 FY2026 (2026-06-30): $0.14.

+94.44% over 10Y

Five-year EPS CAGR: -51.09%. This is endpoint-to-endpoint across the five-year window — a depressed or negative start year can inflate it, so read it against the recent bars.

A five-year EPS CAGR of -51.09% is the clearest support figure for a P/E-based conclusion. If EPS growth slows while the multiple remains elevated, the article should become more cautious after refresh.

Margin Quality

Margin quality is the bridge between sales growth and earnings value. Net margin is 2.08% and price-to-sales is 3.12x, so this section reads profitability beside the sales multiple. A richer sales multiple is easier to defend when profitability is durable. If margins are already elevated, the valuation read should leave room for pressure even when the recent earnings record looks strong.

net margin

CSGP net margin

5.95%

Net margin shows whether the company has enough profitability quality to support its valuation. Q2 FY2026 (2026-06-30): 5.95%.

-5.0pp over 10Y

Net margin (TTM): 2.08%. The bars below are reported fiscal periods (quarterly where available).

Net margin of 2.08% is a quality signal, not a valuation verdict by itself. It matters because a premium multiple is more defensible when margins are structurally strong and less defensible when margins are peaking.

Bull/Bear Valuation Case

The bull case is that revenue growth, EPS growth, and margin quality continue to support the current multiple. The bear case is that the P/E ratio and fair-value gap ask too much of the business if growth slows or margins normalize. Keeping both cases visible prevents the valuation note from becoming either a price chart recap or a model-output recap.

Bull and bear case

Valuation support

  • Five-year revenue CAGR of 14.49% and five-year EPS CAGR of -51.09% support the business case.
  • Net margin of 2.08% is the quality check behind the multiple.

Valuation pressure

  • A P/E ratio of 149.13x can become demanding if EPS growth slows.
  • The analyst-DCF (FMP) margin of safety at -23.99% should change the valuation read if it deteriorates after refresh.

What Could Change The View

The valuation read should change if the third-party DCF (FMP) estimate moves, if the latest close moves materially toward or away from that reference of $20.81, or if revenue and EPS growth break from the stored trend. The dated article snapshot above is the basis for this note; newer figures appear only in the separately labeled current snapshot.

Final Read

The final read is that CoStar Group, Inc. needs valuation support from more than one place: the market multiple, the analyst-DCF (FMP) reference, growth, and margin quality all have to keep pointing in the same direction. Every figure in this research note is checked against data we compute and store from the company's reported filings. It is general research context only, not personalized investment advice or a buy or sell call.

FAQ

Is CSGP fairly valued?

CoStar Group, Inc. trades at 149.13x trailing earnings, while the price gap versus the third-party DCF (FMP) estimate is -23.99%. Read those references alongside five-year revenue CAGR of 14.49% and five-year EPS CAGR of -51.09%; none is a standalone verdict.

What valuation metric matters most for CSGP?

This article anchors on P/E, fair value, margin of safety, price-to-sales, earnings yield, revenue growth, and EPS growth. No single metric is treated as a recommendation.

How often should this CSGP valuation view refresh?

Numbers here are as of October 2, 2026 — the note's dated snapshot. A note whose figures can no longer be verified against the company's reported data is corrected or unpublished rather than left stale.

What would change our mind

  • A material move away from the analyst-DCF (FMP) reference of $20.81.
  • A break in five-year EPS support, currently -51.09%.
  • Margin quality drifting away from the latest net margin of 2.08%.

The bottom line

CoStar Group, Inc. valuation research note from TGMCharts Research, grounded in a dated fundamentals snapshot, chart exhibits, and linked source facts.

Read next: CSGP fundamentalsContinue with CoStar Group, Inc.'s full stock page.
How we checked this researchShow

Data snapshot · By TGMCharts Research.

Every number in this note comes from data we compute and store ourselves from the company's reported figures, plus verbatim excerpts from its SEC filings. When a value isn't available we say so — we never fill gaps with estimates.

Latest filing excerpt

10-Q · filed 2026-07-29 · period 2026-06-30 · SEC EDGAR source

  • “Other Commercial Real Estate Other Commercial Real Estate includes revenue from the Matterport Acquisition, BizBuySell Network, and Ten-X's online auctions for commercial real estate.”
  • “Net new bookings is calculated based on the annualized amount of change in our sales bookings resulting from new subscription-based contracts, changes to existing subscription-based contracts, and cancellations of subscription-based contracts for the period reported.”
  • “Net new bookings is calculated on all subscription-based contracts without regard to contract term.”
  • “Net new bookings is considered an operating metric that is an indicator of future subscription revenue growth and is also used as a metric of sales force productivity by us and investors.”

Every number, checked

Full methodology