Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT)
VZ leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Verizon Communications Inc. and Walmart Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
$48.11Communication Services
WMT
Walmart Inc.
$121.04Consumer Defensive
Total return — VZ vs WMT
growth of $100 · last 30yVZ +70.2%WMT +2695.4%WMT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
VZ WMT
VZ vs WMT: by the numbers
- •WMT is the larger company ($963.25B vs $200.89B market cap).
- •VZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.73 vs 42.47 P/E).
- •VZ converts more revenue to profit (12.46% vs 3.18% net margin).
- •WMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.20% vs 1.44% CAGR).
- •VZ pays the higher dividend yield (5.75% vs 0.80%).
Which is better, VZ or WMT?
Metric tally: VZ 10 · WMT 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueVZ(lower P/E)
GrowthWMT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeVZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityWMT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | VZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.73● | 42.47 |
| Forward P/E | 9.17● | 36.88 |
| P/S ratio | 1.46 | 1.33● |
| P/B ratio | 1.96● | 10.26 |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.02● | 23.28 |
| FCF yield | 9.90%● | 1.30% |
Profitability
| Metric | VZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.85%● | 24.98% |
| Operating margin | 21.22%● | 4.16% |
| Net margin | 12.46%● | 3.18% |
| ROE | 16.78% | 24.44%● |
| ROIC | 6.22% | 11.87%● |
Dividends
| Metric | VZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.75%● | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | 68.10% | 35.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | VZ | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.44% | 5.20%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.14% | 10.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.27%● | -9.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.76% | 22.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, VZ or WMT?
- It depends on your goal. value: VZ (lower P/E); growth: WMT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: VZ (higher dividend yield); quality: WMT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VZ leads 10 to 6.
- Is VZ or WMT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, VZ is cheaper: VZ trades at a 11.73 P/E and WMT at 42.47.
- Which has grown faster, VZ or WMT?
- Over the past five years, WMT grew revenue faster — VZ at a 1.44% CAGR versus WMT at 5.20%.
- Does VZ or WMT pay a bigger dividend?
- VZ yields 5.75% and WMT yields 0.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is VZ or WMT more profitable?
- VZ runs the higher net margin — VZ at 12.46% versus WMT at 3.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, VZ or WMT?
- Over the past 10-year, WMT delivered the higher annualized total return — VZ at 4.53% versus WMT at 19.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Verizon Communications P/E ratioWalmart P/E ratioVerizon Communications dividend yieldWalmart dividend yieldVerizon Communications ROEWalmart ROEVerizon Communications operating marginWalmart operating marginVerizon Communications revenue growthWalmart revenue growthVerizon Communications free cash flowWalmart free cash flow
Verizon Communications & Walmart appear in these rankings
Highest Dividend Yield StocksDividend AristocratsHighest FCF Yield StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.