Vistra Corp. (VST) vs Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL)
VST leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though XEL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Vistra Corp. and Xcel Energy Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — VST vs XEL
growth of $100 · last 10yVST +950.8%XEL +105.8%VST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
VST XEL
VST vs XEL: by the numbers
- •VST is the larger company ($54.92B vs $50.86B market cap).
- •XEL trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.28 vs 27.10 P/E).
- •XEL converts more revenue to profit (14.14% vs 13.82% net margin).
- •VST grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.97% vs 3.82% CAGR).
- •XEL pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.56%).
Which is better, VST or XEL?
Metric tally: VST 8 · XEL 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueXEL(lower P/E)
GrowthVST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeXEL(higher dividend yield)
QualityXEL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | VST | XEL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.10 | 23.28● |
| Forward P/E | 14.38● | 17.95 |
| P/S ratio | 3.41 | 3.45 |
| P/B ratio | 9.89 | 2.14● |
| PEG ratio | 2.42● | 5.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.48● | 14.23 |
| FCF yield | 2.03% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | VST | XEL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.72% | 18.91%● |
| Operating margin | 2.07% | 19.85%● |
| Net margin | 13.82% | 14.14%● |
| ROE | 40.04%● | 8.78% |
| ROIC | 3.30% | 3.77%● |
Dividends
| Metric | VST | XEL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.85%● |
| Payout ratio | 41.18% | 67.59% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | VST | XEL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.97%● | 3.82% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.20%● | 4.20% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -11.04%● | -15.80% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 57.80%● | 7.59% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, VST or XEL?
- It depends on your goal. value: XEL (lower P/E); growth: VST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: XEL (higher dividend yield); quality: XEL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VST leads 8 to 7.
- Is VST or XEL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, XEL is cheaper: VST trades at a 27.10 P/E and XEL at 23.28.
- Which has grown faster, VST or XEL?
- Over the past five years, VST grew revenue faster — VST at a 6.97% CAGR versus XEL at 3.82%.
- Does VST or XEL pay a bigger dividend?
- VST yields 0.56% and XEL yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is VST or XEL more profitable?
- XEL runs the higher net margin — VST at 13.82% versus XEL at 14.14%.
- Which has been the better investment, VST or XEL?
- Over the past 5-year, VST delivered the higher annualized total return — VST at 57.80% versus XEL at 9.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Vistra P/E ratioXcel Energy P/E ratioVistra dividend yieldXcel Energy dividend yieldVistra ROEXcel Energy ROEVistra operating marginXcel Energy operating marginVistra revenue growthXcel Energy revenue growthVistra free cash flowXcel Energy free cash flow
Vistra & Xcel Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.