Which has the lower trailing P/E, VRT or WM?

WM has the lower trailing P/E: VRT trades at 59.26 and WM at 31.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, VRT or WM?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — VRT at a 18.93% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does VRT or WM pay a bigger dividend?

VRT yields 0.09% and WM yields 1.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is VRT or WM more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — VRT at 15.09% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have VRT and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, VRT delivered 57.56% and WM delivered 15.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Vertiv Holdings Co and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$100.85B

$261.95IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Waste Management, Inc.

$89.56B

$224.06IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — VRT vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

VRT +2573.3% (+50.8%/yr)WM +191.8% (+14.3%/yr)VRT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

VRT WM

VRT vs WM: by the numbers

•VRT is the larger company ($100.85B vs $89.56B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.74 vs 59.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 11.12% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs 9.22% CAGR).
•WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.58% vs 0.09%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	VRT	WM
P/E ratio	59.26	31.74
Forward P/E	38.96	27.62
P/S ratio	8.96	3.52
P/B ratio	21.62	9.10
EV / EBITDA	40.67	14.57
FCF yield	2.84%	3.95%

Profitability

Metric	VRT	WM
Gross margin	37.52%	35.04%
Operating margin	19.12%	18.54%
Net margin	15.09%	11.12%
ROE	36.40%	28.74%
ROIC	20.78%	9.01%

Dividends

Metric	VRT	WM
Dividend yield	0.09%	1.58%
Payout ratio	6.45%	52.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	VRT	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.93%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	50.29%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	57.56%	9.62%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, VRT or WM?: WM has the lower trailing P/E: VRT trades at 59.26 and WM at 31.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, VRT or WM?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — VRT at a 18.93% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does VRT or WM pay a bigger dividend?: VRT yields 0.09% and WM yields 1.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is VRT or WM more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — VRT at 15.09% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have VRT and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, VRT delivered 57.56% and WM delivered 15.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full VRT analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Vertiv P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Vertiv dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Vertiv ROE Waste Management ROE Vertiv operating margin Waste Management operating margin Vertiv revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Vertiv free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Vertiv & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.