Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)
VRT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though WM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Vertiv Holdings Co and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — VRT vs WM
growth of $100 · last 8yVRT +3126.5%WM +163.2%VRT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
VRT WM
VRT vs WM: by the numbers
- •VRT is the larger company ($124.42B vs $93.03B market cap).
- •WM trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.86 vs 79.85 P/E).
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 10.99% net margin).
- •VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 10.25% CAGR).
- •WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.62% vs 0.08%).
Which is better, VRT or WM?
Metric tally: VRT 9 · WM 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWM(lower P/E)
GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWM(higher dividend yield)
QualityVRT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | VRT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 79.85 | 33.86● |
| Forward P/E | 48.96 | 28.59● |
| P/S ratio | 11.49 | 3.72● |
| P/B ratio | 29.36 | 9.44● |
| PEG ratio | 0.28● | 2.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 53.39 | 15.30● |
| FCF yield | 1.85% | 3.48%● |
Profitability
| Metric | VRT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.16%● | 32.06% |
| Operating margin | 18.54% | 18.46% |
| Net margin | 14.37%● | 10.99% |
| ROE | 36.71%● | 27.88% |
| ROIC | 18.55%● | 8.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | VRT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.08% | 1.62%● |
| Payout ratio | 7.16% | 56.25% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | VRT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 18.86%● | 10.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 79.41%● | 13.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 41.85%● | 7.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 63.68%● | 12.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, VRT or WM?
- It depends on your goal. value: WM (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WM (higher dividend yield); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRT leads 9 to 7.
- Is VRT or WM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: VRT trades at a 79.85 P/E and WM at 33.86.
- Which has grown faster, VRT or WM?
- Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — VRT at a 18.86% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
- Does VRT or WM pay a bigger dividend?
- VRT yields 0.08% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is VRT or WM more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — VRT at 14.37% versus WM at 10.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, VRT or WM?
- Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — VRT at 63.68% versus WM at 15.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Vertiv P/E ratioWaste Management P/E ratioVertiv dividend yieldWaste Management dividend yieldVertiv ROEWaste Management ROEVertiv operating marginWaste Management operating marginVertiv revenue growthWaste Management revenue growthVertiv free cash flowWaste Management free cash flow
Vertiv & Waste Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.