Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)
ZM leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$183.80Technology
ZM
Zoom Communications, Inc.
$93.68Technology
Total return — VRSK vs ZM
growth of $100 · last 7yVRSK +33.2%ZM +51.1%ZM compounded faster
VRSK ZM
VRSK vs ZM: by the numbers
- •ZM is the larger company ($27.47B vs $24.08B market cap).
- •ZM trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.78 vs 27.98 P/E).
- •ZM converts more revenue to profit (41.99% vs 29.34% net margin).
- •ZM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.51% vs 1.92% CAGR).
- •VRSK pays a dividend (0.76% yield) while ZM does not currently pay one.
Which is better, VRSK or ZM?
Metric tally: VRSK 5 · ZM 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueZM(lower P/E)
GrowthZM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityVRSK(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.98 | 13.78● |
| Forward P/E | 21.23 | 14.92● |
| P/S ratio | 8.01 | 5.70● |
| P/B ratio | 82.71 | 2.82● |
| PEG ratio | 3.39 | 0.16● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.33 | 9.98● |
| FCF yield | 4.54% | 6.97%● |
Profitability
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 67.44% | 77.40%● |
| Operating margin | 44.87%● | 24.17% |
| Net margin | 29.34% | 41.99%● |
| ROE | 293.95%● | 20.77% |
| ROIC | 19.56%● | 8.82% |
Dividends
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | — |
| Payout ratio | 21.51% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.92% | 8.51%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.25% | 21.68%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.58%● | 4.31% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.98%● | -23.86% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, VRSK or ZM?
- It depends on your goal. value: ZM (lower P/E); growth: ZM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: VRSK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ZM leads 11 to 5.
- Is VRSK or ZM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ZM is cheaper: VRSK trades at a 27.98 P/E and ZM at 13.78.
- Which has grown faster, VRSK or ZM?
- Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — VRSK at a 1.92% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.
- Does VRSK or ZM pay a bigger dividend?
- VRSK pays a dividend (0.76% yield) while ZM does not currently pay one.
- Is VRSK or ZM more profitable?
- ZM runs the higher net margin — VRSK at 29.34% versus ZM at 41.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, VRSK or ZM?
- Over the past 5-year, VRSK delivered the higher annualized total return — VRSK at 9.36% versus ZM at -23.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Verisk Analytics P/E ratioZoom Communications P/E ratioVerisk Analytics dividend yieldZoom Communications dividend yieldVerisk Analytics ROEZoom Communications ROEVerisk Analytics operating marginZoom Communications operating marginVerisk Analytics revenue growthZoom Communications revenue growthVerisk Analytics free cash flowZoom Communications free cash flow
Verisk Analytics & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.