Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)
A side-by-side comparison of Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$213.15TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ZM
Zoom Communications, Inc.
$92.41TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — VRSK vs ZM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yVRSK +61.7%ZM +47.5%VRSK compounded faster
VRSK ZM
VRSK vs ZM: by the numbers
- •VRSK is the larger company ($27.93B vs $27.10B market cap).
- •ZM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.45 vs 32.31 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ZM converts more revenue to profit (41.99% vs 29.34% net margin).
- •ZM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.51% vs 1.92% CAGR).
- •VRSK pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.31 | 13.45 |
| Forward P/E | 27.69 | 15.33 |
| P/S ratio | 9.25 | 5.57 |
| P/B ratio | 95.51 | 2.75 |
| PEG ratio | 3.92 | 0.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.28 | 19.87 |
| FCF yield | 3.93% | 7.14% |
Profitability
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 67.44% | 77.40% |
| Operating margin | 44.87% | 24.17% |
| Net margin | 29.34% | 41.99% |
| ROE | 293.95% | 20.77% |
| ROIC | 19.56% | 8.82% |
Dividends
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 29.19% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | VRSK | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.92% | 8.51% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.25% | 21.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.58% | 4.31% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.46% | -24.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, VRSK or ZM?
- ZM has the lower trailing P/E: VRSK trades at 32.31 and ZM at 13.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, VRSK or ZM?
- Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — VRSK at a 1.92% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.
- Does VRSK or ZM pay a bigger dividend?
- VRSK pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is VRSK or ZM more profitable?
- ZM runs the higher net margin — VRSK at 29.34% versus ZM at 41.99%.
- How have VRSK and ZM total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, VRSK delivered 10.07% and ZM delivered -24.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Verisk Analytics P/E ratioZoom Communications P/E ratioVerisk Analytics dividend yieldZoom Communications dividend yieldVerisk Analytics ROEZoom Communications ROEVerisk Analytics operating marginZoom Communications operating marginVerisk Analytics revenue growthZoom Communications revenue growthVerisk Analytics free cash flowZoom Communications free cash flow
Verisk Analytics & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.