Vale S.A. (VALE) vs Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
WPM leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though VALE is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Vale S.A. and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
VALE
Vale S.A.
$14.84Basic Materials
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
$112.79Basic Materials
Total return — VALE vs WPM
growth of $100 · last 21yVALE +101.1%WPM +3515.1%WPM compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
VALE WPM
VALE vs WPM: by the numbers
- •VALE is the larger company ($63.29B vs $51.22B market cap).
- •VALE trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.48 vs 28.48 P/E).
- •WPM converts more revenue to profit (65.55% vs 7.06% net margin).
- •WPM grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.70% vs -2.82% CAGR).
- •VALE pays the higher dividend yield (6.85% vs 0.64%).
Which is better, VALE or WPM?
Metric tally: VALE 7 · WPM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueVALE(lower P/E)
GrowthWPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeVALE(higher dividend yield)
QualityWPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | VALE | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 22.48● | 28.48 |
| Forward P/E | 7.66● | 19.93 |
| P/S ratio | 1.60● | 18.68 |
| P/B ratio | 1.73● | 5.53 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.20 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.80● | 20.45 |
| FCF yield | 5.29%● | 1.93% |
Profitability
| Metric | VALE | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 34.52% | 77.10%● |
| Operating margin | 27.84% | 71.81%● |
| Net margin | 7.06% | 65.55%● |
| ROE | 7.62% | 19.41%● |
| ROIC | 6.85% | 15.60%● |
Dividends
| Metric | VALE | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.85%● | 0.64% |
| Payout ratio | 175.15% | 21.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | VALE | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.82% | 18.70%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -10.50% | 22.63%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -26.26% | 8.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.37% | 22.11%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, VALE or WPM?
- It depends on your goal. value: VALE (lower P/E); growth: WPM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: VALE (higher dividend yield); quality: WPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WPM leads 9 to 7.
- Is VALE or WPM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, VALE is cheaper: VALE trades at a 22.48 P/E and WPM at 28.48.
- Which has grown faster, VALE or WPM?
- Over the past five years, WPM grew revenue faster — VALE at a -2.82% CAGR versus WPM at 18.70%.
- Does VALE or WPM pay a bigger dividend?
- VALE yields 6.85% and WPM yields 0.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is VALE or WPM more profitable?
- WPM runs the higher net margin — VALE at 7.06% versus WPM at 65.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, VALE or WPM?
- Over the past 10-year, VALE delivered the higher annualized total return — VALE at 20.77% versus WPM at 19.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Vale P/E ratioWheaton Precious Metals P/E ratioVale dividend yieldWheaton Precious Metals dividend yieldVale ROEWheaton Precious Metals ROEVale operating marginWheaton Precious Metals operating marginVale revenue growthWheaton Precious Metals revenue growthVale free cash flowWheaton Precious Metals free cash flow
Vale & Wheaton Precious Metals appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.