Trane Technologies plc (TT) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)
TT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though WM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Trane Technologies plc and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — TT vs WM
growth of $100 · last 30yTT +4221.0%WM +731.6%TT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
TT WM
TT vs WM: by the numbers
- •TT is the larger company ($104.34B vs $93.03B market cap).
- •WM trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.86 vs 36.53 P/E).
- •TT converts more revenue to profit (13.42% vs 10.99% net margin).
- •TT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.98% vs 10.25% CAGR).
- •WM pays the higher dividend yield (1.62% vs 0.89%).
Which is better, TT or WM?
Metric tally: TT 9 · WM 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWM(lower P/E)
GrowthTT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWM(higher dividend yield)
QualityTT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.53 | 33.86● |
| Forward P/E | 31.67 | 28.59● |
| P/S ratio | 4.88 | 3.72● |
| P/B ratio | 12.23 | 9.44● |
| PEG ratio | 2.06● | 2.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.31 | 15.30● |
| FCF yield | 3.00% | 3.48%● |
Profitability
| Metric | TT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.92%● | 32.06% |
| Operating margin | 18.17% | 18.46% |
| Net margin | 13.42%● | 10.99% |
| ROE | 33.65%● | 27.88% |
| ROIC | 20.26%● | 8.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | TT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.89% | 1.62%● |
| Payout ratio | 32.09% | 56.25% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.98%● | 10.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.75%● | 13.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.10%● | 7.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.86%● | 12.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TT or WM?
- It depends on your goal. value: WM (lower P/E); growth: TT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WM (higher dividend yield); quality: TT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TT leads 9 to 7.
- Is TT or WM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WM is cheaper: TT trades at a 36.53 P/E and WM at 33.86.
- Which has grown faster, TT or WM?
- Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — TT at a 10.98% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
- Does TT or WM pay a bigger dividend?
- TT yields 0.89% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TT or WM more profitable?
- TT runs the higher net margin — TT at 13.42% versus WM at 10.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, TT or WM?
- Over the past 10-year, TT delivered the higher annualized total return — TT at 26.92% versus WM at 15.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Trane Technologies P/E ratioWaste Management P/E ratioTrane Technologies dividend yieldWaste Management dividend yieldTrane Technologies ROEWaste Management ROETrane Technologies operating marginWaste Management operating marginTrane Technologies revenue growthWaste Management revenue growthTrane Technologies free cash flowWaste Management free cash flow
Trane Technologies & Waste Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.