Which has the lower trailing P/E, TT or VRT?

TT has the lower trailing P/E: TT trades at 33.37 and VRT at 57.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, TT or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — TT at a 10.44% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.

Does TT or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

TT yields 0.92% and VRT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is TT or VRT more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — TT at 13.28% versus VRT at 15.09%.

How have TT and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, TT delivered 19.98% and VRT delivered 60.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Trane Technologies plc (TT) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Trane Technologies plc and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Trane Technologies plc

$96.85B

$440.19IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 23, 2026, 11:20 AM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$97.90B

$254.31IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 23, 2026, 11:20 AM EDT

Total return — TT vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

TT +615.9% (+27.9%/yr)VRT +2582.9% (+50.9%/yr)VRT compounded faster over this window

TT VRT

TT vs VRT: by the numbers

•VRT is the larger company ($97.90B vs $96.85B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.37 vs 57.54 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 13.28% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.93% vs 10.44% CAGR).
•TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.09%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	TT	VRT
P/E ratio	33.37	57.54
Forward P/E	28.82	37.82
P/S ratio	4.36	8.53
P/B ratio	11.20	20.58
EV / EBITDA	22.89	38.72
FCF yield	3.71%	2.99%

Profitability

Metric	TT	VRT
Gross margin	35.39%	37.52%
Operating margin	17.94%	19.12%
Net margin	13.28%	15.09%
ROE	34.11%	36.40%
ROIC	19.89%	20.78%

Dividends

Metric	TT	VRT
Dividend yield	0.92%	0.09%
Payout ratio	31.01%	5.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	TT	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.44%	18.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	29.75%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.84%	50.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.98%	60.16%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, TT or VRT?: TT has the lower trailing P/E: TT trades at 33.37 and VRT at 57.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, TT or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — TT at a 10.44% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
Does TT or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: TT yields 0.92% and VRT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is TT or VRT more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — TT at 13.28% versus VRT at 15.09%.
How have TT and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, TT delivered 19.98% and VRT delivered 60.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full TT analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Trane Technologies P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Trane Technologies dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Trane Technologies ROE Vertiv ROE Trane Technologies operating margin Vertiv operating margin Trane Technologies revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Trane Technologies free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Trane Technologies & Vertiv appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.