Trane Technologies plc (TT) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
TT leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Trane Technologies plc and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — TT vs VRT
growth of $100 · last 8yTT +528.9%VRT +3131.7%VRT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
TT VRT
TT vs VRT: by the numbers
- •VRT is the larger company ($122.27B vs $104.86B market cap).
- •TT trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.69 vs 79.98 P/E).
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 13.42% net margin).
- •VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 10.98% CAGR).
- •TT pays the higher dividend yield (0.84% vs 0.07%).
Which is better, TT or VRT?
Metric tally: TT 8 · VRT 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTT(lower P/E)
GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTT(higher dividend yield)
QualityTT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.69● | 79.98 |
| Forward P/E | 27.87● | 36.20 |
| P/S ratio | 4.90● | 11.51 |
| P/B ratio | 12.29● | 29.41 |
| PEG ratio | 2.06 | 0.28● |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.64● | 54.09 |
| FCF yield | 2.99%● | 1.85% |
Profitability
| Metric | TT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.92% | 36.16% |
| Operating margin | 18.17% | 18.54% |
| Net margin | 13.42% | 14.37%● |
| ROE | 33.65% | 36.71%● |
| ROIC | 20.26%● | 18.55% |
Dividends
| Metric | TT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.84%● | 0.07% |
| Payout ratio | 30.40% | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TT | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.98% | 18.86%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.75% | 79.41%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.10% | 41.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 22.96% | 63.98%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TT or VRT?
- It depends on your goal. value: TT (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TT (higher dividend yield); quality: TT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TT leads 8 to 7.
- Is TT or VRT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TT is cheaper: TT trades at a 36.69 P/E and VRT at 79.98.
- Which has grown faster, TT or VRT?
- Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — TT at a 10.98% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
- Does TT or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- TT yields 0.84% and VRT yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TT or VRT more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — TT at 13.42% versus VRT at 14.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, TT or VRT?
- Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — TT at 26.86% versus VRT at 63.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Trane Technologies P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioTrane Technologies dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldTrane Technologies ROEVertiv ROETrane Technologies operating marginVertiv operating marginTrane Technologies revenue growthVertiv revenue growthTrane Technologies free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Trane Technologies & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.