Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) vs Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN)
A side-by-side comparison of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Waste Connections, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 27, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$104.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WCN
Waste Connections, Inc.
$165.68IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — TRI vs WCN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yTRI +168.4% (+10.4%/yr)WCN +247.6% (+13.3%/yr)WCN compounded faster over this window
TRI WCN
TRI vs WCN: by the numbers
- •TRI is the larger company ($45.74B vs $41.76B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.02 vs 40.12 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (21.22% vs 10.86% net margin).
- •WCN grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.38% vs 4.88% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (3.77% vs 0.85%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TRI | WCN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.02 | 40.12 |
| Forward P/E | 23.38 | 28.92 |
| P/S ratio | 5.87 | 4.33 |
| P/B ratio | 4.14 | 5.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.48 | 17.57 |
| FCF yield | 4.82% | 4.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | TRI | WCN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.80% | 39.22% |
| Operating margin | 27.64% | 17.09% |
| Net margin | 21.22% | 10.86% |
| ROE | 14.96% | 13.44% |
| ROIC | 11.04% | 6.63% |
Dividends
| Metric | TRI | WCN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.77% | 0.85% |
| Payout ratio | 116.05% | 33.41% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TRI | WCN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.88% | 11.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.22% | 39.97% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 16.32% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.02% | 6.06% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, TRI or WCN?
- TRI has the lower trailing P/E: TRI trades at 28.02 and WCN at 40.12. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, TRI or WCN?
- Over the past five years, WCN grew revenue faster — TRI at a 4.88% CAGR versus WCN at 11.38%.
- Does TRI or WCN pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI yields 3.77% and WCN yields 0.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TRI or WCN more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — TRI at 21.22% versus WCN at 10.86%.
- How have TRI and WCN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, TRI delivered 10.41% and WCN delivered 13.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Thomson Reuters P/E ratioWaste Connections P/E ratioThomson Reuters dividend yieldWaste Connections dividend yieldThomson Reuters ROEWaste Connections ROEThomson Reuters operating marginWaste Connections operating marginThomson Reuters revenue growthWaste Connections revenue growthThomson Reuters free cash flowWaste Connections free cash flow
Thomson Reuters & Waste Connections appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 27, 2026.