Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL)
A side-by-side comparison of Thomson Reuters Corporation and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$97.35IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$109.82IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — TRI vs UAL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yTRI +165.1% (+10.2%/yr)UAL +110.0% (+7.7%/yr)TRI compounded faster over this window
TRI UAL
TRI vs UAL: by the numbers
- •TRI is the larger company ($42.50B vs $35.64B market cap).
- •UAL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.27 vs 26.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (21.22% vs 5.56% net margin).
- •UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.94% vs 4.88% CAGR).
- •TRI pays a dividend (4.11% yield), while UAL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.03 | 10.27 |
| Forward P/E | 21.75 | 10.93 |
| P/S ratio | 5.43 | 0.57 |
| P/B ratio | 3.82 | 2.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.38 | 7.52 |
| FCF yield | 5.21% | 7.14% |
Profitability
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.80% | 65.06% |
| Operating margin | 27.64% | 7.75% |
| Net margin | 21.22% | 5.56% |
| ROE | 14.96% | 20.94% |
| ROIC | 11.04% | 6.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 107.11% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.88% | 33.94% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.22% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 52.93% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -3.01% | 18.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, TRI or UAL?
- UAL has the lower trailing P/E: TRI trades at 26.03 and UAL at 10.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, TRI or UAL?
- Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — TRI at a 4.88% CAGR versus UAL at 33.94%.
- Does TRI or UAL pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI pays a dividend (4.11% yield), while UAL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is TRI or UAL more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — TRI at 21.22% versus UAL at 5.56%.
- How have TRI and UAL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, TRI delivered 9.81% and UAL delivered 7.40% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Thomson Reuters P/E ratioUnited Airlines P/E ratioThomson Reuters dividend yieldThomson Reuters ROEUnited Airlines ROEThomson Reuters operating marginUnited Airlines operating marginThomson Reuters revenue growthUnited Airlines revenue growthThomson Reuters free cash flowUnited Airlines free cash flow
Thomson Reuters & United Airlines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.