Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) vs United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL)
UAL leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Thomson Reuters Corporation and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$98.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
UAL
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
$121.59IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
Total return — TRI vs UAL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 20yTRI +271.8%UAL +309.2%UAL compounded faster
TRI UAL
TRI vs UAL: by the numbers
- •TRI is the larger company ($42.91B vs $39.47B market cap).
- •UAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.74 vs 26.82 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 6.06% net margin).
- •UAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (41.67% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays a dividend (4.30% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, TRI or UAL?
Metric tally: TRI 4 · UAL 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUAL(lower P/E)
GrowthUAL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityTRI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.82 | 10.74● |
| Forward P/E | 21.18 | 11.60● |
| P/S ratio | 5.24 | 0.65● |
| P/B ratio | 3.39 | 2.48● |
| PEG ratio | 3.72 | 1.67● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.11 | 7.74● |
| FCF yield | 5.21% | 8.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.81%● | 64.24% |
| Operating margin | 26.66%● | 8.44% |
| Net margin | 19.93%● | 6.06% |
| ROE | 12.89% | 23.09%● |
| ROIC | 10.13%● | 6.63% |
Dividends
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.30% | — |
| Payout ratio | 116.05% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TRI | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.86% | 41.67%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.22% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 61.78%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.13% | 20.10%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TRI or UAL?
- It depends on your goal. value: UAL (lower P/E); growth: UAL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TRI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UAL leads 11 to 4.
- Is TRI or UAL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UAL is cheaper: TRI trades at a 26.82 P/E and UAL at 10.74.
- Which has grown faster, TRI or UAL?
- Over the past five years, UAL grew revenue faster — TRI at a 4.86% CAGR versus UAL at 41.67%.
- Does TRI or UAL pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI pays a dividend (4.30% yield) while UAL does not currently pay one.
- Is TRI or UAL more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — TRI at 19.93% versus UAL at 6.06%.
- Which has been the better investment, TRI or UAL?
- Over the past 10-year, UAL delivered the higher annualized total return — TRI at 8.55% versus UAL at 9.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Thomson Reuters P/E ratioUnited Airlines P/E ratioThomson Reuters dividend yieldUnited Airlines dividend yieldThomson Reuters ROEUnited Airlines ROEThomson Reuters operating marginUnited Airlines operating marginThomson Reuters revenue growthUnited Airlines revenue growthThomson Reuters free cash flowUnited Airlines free cash flow
Thomson Reuters & United Airlines appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.