Is TPR or WSM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, WSM is cheaper: TPR trades at a 46.79 P/E and WSM at 26.78.

Which has grown faster, TPR or WSM?

Over the past five years, TPR grew revenue faster — TPR at a 10.13% CAGR versus WSM at 1.55%.

Does TPR or WSM pay a bigger dividend?

TPR yields 1.10% and WSM yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is TPR or WSM more profitable?

WSM runs the higher net margin — TPR at 8.44% versus WSM at 13.81%.

Which has been the better investment, TPR or WSM?

Over the past 10-year, WSM delivered the higher annualized total return — TPR at 17.17% versus WSM at 27.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)

WSM leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Tapestry, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

TPR

Tapestry, Inc.

$29.50B

$146.00Consumer Cyclical

WSM

Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

$28.14B

$239.19Consumer Cyclical

Total return — TPR vs WSM

growth of $100 · last 26y

TPR +5648.0%WSM +3236.0%TPR compounded faster

TPR WSM

TPR vs WSM: by the numbers

•TPR is the larger company ($29.50B vs $28.14B market cap).
•WSM trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.78 vs 46.79 P/E).
•WSM converts more revenue to profit (13.81% vs 8.44% net margin).
•TPR grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.13% vs 1.55% CAGR).
•WSM pays the higher dividend yield (1.27% vs 1.10%).

Which is better, TPR or WSM?

Metric tally: TPR 7 · WSM 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueWSM(lower P/E)

GrowthTPR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWSM(higher dividend yield)

QualityWSM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	TPR	WSM
P/E ratio	46.79	26.78●
Forward P/E	20.93●	27.47
P/S ratio	3.87	3.64●
P/B ratio	44.57	15.34●
PEG ratio	—	42.57
EV / EBITDA	30.36	16.24●
FCF yield	5.77%●	3.82%

Profitability

Metric	TPR	WSM
Gross margin	76.18%●	46.06%
Operating margin	11.32%	17.97%●
Net margin	8.44%	13.81%●
ROE	97.13%●	58.22%
ROIC	6.59%	28.83%●

Dividends

Metric	TPR	WSM
Dividend yield	1.10%	1.27%●
Payout ratio	188.24%	33.93%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	TPR	WSM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.13%●	1.55%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-14.80%	15.25%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.89%●	-3.21%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	30.58%●	26.98%

Frequently asked

Which is better, TPR or WSM?: It depends on your goal. value: WSM (lower P/E); growth: TPR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WSM (higher dividend yield); quality: WSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WSM leads 9 to 7.
Is TPR or WSM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, WSM is cheaper: TPR trades at a 46.79 P/E and WSM at 26.78.
Which has grown faster, TPR or WSM?: Over the past five years, TPR grew revenue faster — TPR at a 10.13% CAGR versus WSM at 1.55%.
Does TPR or WSM pay a bigger dividend?: TPR yields 1.10% and WSM yields 1.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is TPR or WSM more profitable?: WSM runs the higher net margin — TPR at 8.44% versus WSM at 13.81%.
Which has been the better investment, TPR or WSM?: Over the past 10-year, WSM delivered the higher annualized total return — TPR at 17.17% versus WSM at 27.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full TPR analysis Full WSM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Tapestry P/E ratio Williams-Sonoma P/E ratio Tapestry dividend yield Williams-Sonoma dividend yield Tapestry ROE Williams-Sonoma ROE Tapestry operating margin Williams-Sonoma operating margin Tapestry revenue growth Williams-Sonoma revenue growth Tapestry free cash flow Williams-Sonoma free cash flow

Tapestry & Williams-Sonoma appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.