Teradyne, Inc. (TER) vs Block, Inc. (XYZ)
XYZ leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Teradyne, Inc. and Block, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$342.12TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
XYZ
Block, Inc.
$81.81TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — TER vs XYZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 11yTER +1678.1%XYZ +525.9%TER compounded faster
TER XYZ
TER vs XYZ: by the numbers
- •TER is the larger company ($53.56B vs $48.69B market cap).
- •TER trades at the lower earnings multiple (63.36 vs 63.91 P/E).
- •TER converts more revenue to profit (22.55% vs 3.30% net margin).
- •XYZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.19% vs 3.76% CAGR).
- •TER pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while XYZ does not currently pay one.
Which is better, TER or XYZ?
Metric tally: TER 6 · XYZ 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthXYZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityTER(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TER | XYZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.36 | 63.91 |
| Forward P/E | 45.88 | 20.99● |
| P/S ratio | 14.24 | 2.00● |
| P/B ratio | 17.15 | 2.25● |
| PEG ratio | 23.64 | 1.84● |
| EV / EBITDA | 48.08 | 13.60● |
| FCF yield | 1.03% | 6.67%● |
Profitability
| Metric | TER | XYZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.79%● | 44.85% |
| Operating margin | 26.92%● | 11.74% |
| Net margin | 22.55%● | 3.30% |
| ROE | 27.17%● | 3.72% |
| ROIC | 18.45%● | 7.52% |
Dividends
| Metric | TER | XYZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.15% | — |
| Payout ratio | 14.33% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TER | XYZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.76% | 13.19%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -5.86% | 34.72%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -3.97% | 64.00%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 23.16%● | -19.04% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TER or XYZ?
- It depends on your goal. growth: XYZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, XYZ leads 9 to 6.
- Is TER or XYZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TER is cheaper: TER trades at a 63.36 P/E and XYZ at 63.91.
- Which has grown faster, TER or XYZ?
- Over the past five years, XYZ grew revenue faster — TER at a 3.76% CAGR versus XYZ at 13.19%.
- Does TER or XYZ pay a bigger dividend?
- TER pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while XYZ does not currently pay one.
- Is TER or XYZ more profitable?
- TER runs the higher net margin — TER at 22.55% versus XYZ at 3.30%.
- Which has been the better investment, TER or XYZ?
- Over the past 10-year, TER delivered the higher annualized total return — TER at 33.07% versus XYZ at 24.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Teradyne P/E ratioBlock P/E ratioTeradyne dividend yieldBlock dividend yieldTeradyne ROEBlock ROETeradyne operating marginBlock operating marginTeradyne revenue growthBlock revenue growthTeradyne free cash flowBlock free cash flow
Teradyne & Block appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.