Teradyne, Inc. (TER) vs United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC)
UMC leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Teradyne, Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$420.12Technology
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
$26.20Technology
Total return — TER vs UMC
growth of $100 · last 26yTER +721.7%UMC +124.3%TER compounded faster
TER UMC
TER vs UMC: by the numbers
- •TER is the larger company ($65.77B vs $65.35B market cap).
- •UMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (48.60 vs 77.80 P/E).
- •TER converts more revenue to profit (22.55% vs 20.72% net margin).
- •UMC grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.42% vs 3.76% CAGR).
- •UMC pays the higher dividend yield (1.84% vs 0.12%).
Which is better, TER or UMC?
Metric tally: TER 5 · UMC 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUMC(lower P/E)
GrowthUMC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityTER(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TER | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 77.80 | 48.60● |
| Forward P/E | 57.01 | — |
| P/S ratio | 17.49 | 8.54● |
| P/B ratio | 21.07 | 5.41● |
| PEG ratio | 23.64 | 9.27● |
| EV / EBITDA | 59.78 | 17.91● |
| FCF yield | 0.84% | 2.46%● |
Profitability
| Metric | TER | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 58.79%● | 29.60% |
| Operating margin | 26.92%● | 18.85% |
| Net margin | 22.55%● | 20.72% |
| ROE | 27.17%● | 12.74% |
| ROIC | 18.45%● | 7.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | TER | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 1.84%● |
| Payout ratio | 14.33% | 90.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TER | UMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.76% | 10.42%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -5.86% | 4.35%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -3.97% | 4.51%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 27.49% | 30.10%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TER or UMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: UMC (lower P/E); growth: UMC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: UMC (higher dividend yield); quality: TER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UMC leads 11 to 5.
- Is TER or UMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UMC is cheaper: TER trades at a 77.80 P/E and UMC at 48.60.
- Which has grown faster, TER or UMC?
- Over the past five years, UMC grew revenue faster — TER at a 3.76% CAGR versus UMC at 10.42%.
- Does TER or UMC pay a bigger dividend?
- TER yields 0.12% and UMC yields 1.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TER or UMC more profitable?
- TER runs the higher net margin — TER at 22.55% versus UMC at 20.72%.
- Which has been the better investment, TER or UMC?
- Over the past 10-year, TER delivered the higher annualized total return — TER at 36.17% versus UMC at 35.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Teradyne P/E ratioUnited Microelectronics P/E ratioTeradyne dividend yieldUnited Microelectronics dividend yieldTeradyne ROEUnited Microelectronics ROETeradyne operating marginUnited Microelectronics operating marginTeradyne revenue growthUnited Microelectronics revenue growthTeradyne free cash flowUnited Microelectronics free cash flow
Teradyne & United Microelectronics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.