Bio-Techne Corporation (TECH) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
UHS leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Bio-Techne Corporation and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TECH
Bio-Techne Corporation
$71.00Healthcare
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$145.69Healthcare
Total return — TECH vs UHS
growth of $100 · last 30yTECH +3779.8%UHS +2141.4%TECH compounded faster
TECH UHS
TECH vs UHS: by the numbers
- •TECH is the larger company ($11.12B vs $9.12B market cap).
- •UHS trades at the lower earnings multiple (6.11 vs 102.90 P/E).
- •TECH converts more revenue to profit (9.05% vs 8.56% net margin).
- •UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 7.39% CAGR).
- •UHS pays the higher dividend yield (0.55% vs 0.45%).
Which is better, TECH or UHS?
Metric tally: TECH 3 · UHS 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUHS(lower P/E)
GrowthUHS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUHS(higher dividend yield)
QualityUHS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 102.90 | 6.11● |
| Forward P/E | 34.43 | 6.21● |
| P/S ratio | 9.20 | 0.51● |
| P/B ratio | 5.34 | 1.19● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 44.17 | 5.25● |
| FCF yield | 2.42% | 9.94%● |
Profitability
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.96% | 90.45%● |
| Operating margin | 12.70%● | 11.50% |
| Net margin | 9.05%● | 8.56% |
| ROE | 5.25% | 20.19%● |
| ROIC | 3.18% | 11.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.55%● |
| Payout ratio | 68.09% | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.39% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -20.72% | 16.19%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.72%● | -4.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.83% | -0.22%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TECH or UHS?
- It depends on your goal. value: UHS (lower P/E); growth: UHS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: UHS (higher dividend yield); quality: UHS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 13 to 3.
- Is TECH or UHS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UHS is cheaper: TECH trades at a 102.90 P/E and UHS at 6.11.
- Which has grown faster, TECH or UHS?
- Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — TECH at a 7.39% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does TECH or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- TECH yields 0.45% and UHS yields 0.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TECH or UHS more profitable?
- TECH runs the higher net margin — TECH at 9.05% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, TECH or UHS?
- Over the past 10-year, TECH delivered the higher annualized total return — TECH at 10.47% versus UHS at 1.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bio-Techne P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioBio-Techne dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldBio-Techne ROEUniversal Health Services ROEBio-Techne operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginBio-Techne revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthBio-Techne free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Bio-Techne & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.