Bio-Techne Corporation (TECH) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
A side-by-side comparison of Bio-Techne Corporation and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
TECH
Bio-Techne Corporation
$72.61HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$178.86HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — TECH vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yTECH +184.8% (+11.0%/yr)UHS +50.2% (+4.2%/yr)TECH compounded faster over this window
TECH UHS
TECH vs UHS: by the numbers
- •TECH is the larger company ($11.37B vs $10.83B market cap).
- •UHS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.34 vs 62.59 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TECH converts more revenue to profit (14.97% vs 8.42% net margin).
- •UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.21% vs 5.47% CAGR).
- •TECH pays the higher dividend yield (0.55% vs 0.46%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 62.59 | 7.34 |
| Forward P/E | 35.33 | 7.94 |
| P/S ratio | 9.36 | 0.60 |
| P/B ratio | 5.39 | 1.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.62 | 5.91 |
| FCF yield | 2.32% | 7.64% |
Profitability
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 65.77% | 90.69% |
| Operating margin | 20.73% | 11.36% |
| Net margin | 14.97% | 8.42% |
| ROE | 8.63% | 20.31% |
| ROIC | 7.86% | 11.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.46% |
| Payout ratio | 34.48% | 3.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TECH | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | 8.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.16% | 16.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -3.08% | -12.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -10.58% | 3.74% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, TECH or UHS?
- UHS has the lower trailing P/E: TECH trades at 62.59 and UHS at 7.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, TECH or UHS?
- Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — TECH at a 5.47% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
- Does TECH or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- TECH yields 0.55% and UHS yields 0.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TECH or UHS more profitable?
- TECH runs the higher net margin — TECH at 14.97% versus UHS at 8.42%.
- How have TECH and UHS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, TECH delivered 11.18% and UHS delivered 4.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bio-Techne P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioBio-Techne dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldBio-Techne ROEUniversal Health Services ROEBio-Techne operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginBio-Techne revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthBio-Techne free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Bio-Techne & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.