Which has grown faster, TEAM or ZM?

Over the past five years, TEAM grew revenue faster — TEAM at a 25.86% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.

Is TEAM or ZM more profitable?

ZM runs the higher net margin — TEAM at -3.50% versus ZM at 41.99%.

Which has been the better investment, TEAM or ZM?

Over the past 5-year, TEAM delivered the higher annualized total return — TEAM at 13.42% versus ZM at -23.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)

ZM leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Atlassian Corporation and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

TEAM

Atlassian Corporation

$24.05B

$91.55Technology

Zoom Communications, Inc.

$27.64B

$94.25Technology

Total return — TEAM vs ZM

growth of $100 · last 7y

TEAM -10.2%ZM +52.0%ZM compounded faster

TEAM ZM

TEAM vs ZM: by the numbers

•ZM is the larger company ($27.64B vs $24.05B market cap).
•ZM is profitable (41.99% net margin) while TEAM runs a net loss (-3.50%).
•TEAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (25.86% vs 8.51% CAGR).

Which is better, TEAM or ZM?

Metric tally: TEAM 5 · ZM 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthTEAM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityZM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	TEAM	ZM
P/E ratio	—	13.86
Forward P/E	14.73	15.01
P/S ratio	3.86●	5.74
P/B ratio	27.18	2.84●
PEG ratio	—	0.16
EV / EBITDA	2159.50	10.04●
FCF yield	5.04%	6.93%●

Profitability

Metric	TEAM	ZM
Gross margin	83.85%●	77.40%
Operating margin	-3.71%	24.17%●
Net margin	-3.50%	41.99%●
ROE	-24.66%	20.77%●
ROIC	-4.48%	8.82%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	TEAM	ZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	25.86%●	8.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	21.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.19%●	4.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-17.93%●	-23.47%

Frequently asked

Which is better, TEAM or ZM?: It depends on your goal. growth: TEAM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ZM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ZM leads 7 to 5.
Which has grown faster, TEAM or ZM?: Over the past five years, TEAM grew revenue faster — TEAM at a 25.86% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.
Is TEAM or ZM more profitable?: ZM runs the higher net margin — TEAM at -3.50% versus ZM at 41.99%.
Which has been the better investment, TEAM or ZM?: Over the past 5-year, TEAM delivered the higher annualized total return — TEAM at 13.42% versus ZM at -23.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full TEAM analysis Full ZM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Atlassian P/E ratio Zoom Communications P/E ratio Atlassian dividend yield Zoom Communications dividend yield Atlassian ROE Zoom Communications ROE Atlassian operating margin Zoom Communications operating margin Atlassian revenue growth Zoom Communications revenue growth Atlassian free cash flow Zoom Communications free cash flow

Atlassian & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.