Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) vs Textron Inc. (TXT)
TXT leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Textron Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — SWK vs TXT
growth of $100 · last 30ySWK +203.9%TXT +328.0%TXT compounded faster
SWK TXT
SWK vs TXT: by the numbers
- •TXT is the larger company ($15.05B vs $13.94B market cap).
- •TXT trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.55 vs 36.75 P/E).
- •TXT converts more revenue to profit (6.15% vs 2.44% net margin).
- •TXT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.26% vs 0.68% CAGR).
- •SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 0.09%).
Which is better, SWK or TXT?
Metric tally: SWK 6 · TXT 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTXT(lower P/E)
GrowthTXT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)
QualityTXT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SWK | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.75 | 16.55● |
| Forward P/E | 16.71 | 11.82● |
| P/S ratio | 0.90● | 1.00 |
| P/B ratio | 1.52● | 1.91 |
| PEG ratio | 0.82● | 1.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.77 | 10.51● |
| FCF yield | 5.31%● | 4.64% |
Profitability
| Metric | SWK | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.03%● | 14.41% |
| Operating margin | 7.79% | 8.37%● |
| Net margin | 2.44% | 6.15%● |
| ROE | 4.13% | 11.67%● |
| ROIC | 6.41% | 7.33%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SWK | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.70%● | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 125.28% | 1.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SWK | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.68% | 5.26%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -19.52% | 30.49%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -17.64% | 6.96%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -11.94% | 5.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SWK or TXT?
- It depends on your goal. value: TXT (lower P/E); growth: TXT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: TXT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TXT leads 11 to 6.
- Is SWK or TXT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TXT is cheaper: SWK trades at a 36.75 P/E and TXT at 16.55.
- Which has grown faster, SWK or TXT?
- Over the past five years, TXT grew revenue faster — SWK at a 0.68% CAGR versus TXT at 5.26%.
- Does SWK or TXT pay a bigger dividend?
- SWK yields 3.70% and TXT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SWK or TXT more profitable?
- TXT runs the higher net margin — SWK at 2.44% versus TXT at 6.15%.
- Which has been the better investment, SWK or TXT?
- Over the past 10-year, TXT delivered the higher annualized total return — SWK at 0.91% versus TXT at 9.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Stanley Black & Decker P/E ratioTextron P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldTextron dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker ROETextron ROEStanley Black & Decker operating marginTextron operating marginStanley Black & Decker revenue growthTextron revenue growthStanley Black & Decker free cash flowTextron free cash flow
Stanley Black & Decker & Textron appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.