Smurfit Westrock plc (SW) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)
WSM leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Smurfit Westrock plc and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SW
Smurfit Westrock plc
$45.93Consumer Cyclical
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$227.53Consumer Cyclical
Total return — SW vs WSM
growth of $100 · last 18ySW +465.5%WSM +1928.0%WSM compounded faster
SW WSM
SW vs WSM: by the numbers
- •WSM is the larger company ($26.79B vs $24.09B market cap).
- •WSM trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.55 vs 64.11 P/E).
- •WSM converts more revenue to profit (13.81% vs 1.23% net margin).
- •SW grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.07% vs 1.55% CAGR).
- •SW pays the higher dividend yield (3.94% vs 1.33%).
Which is better, SW or WSM?
Metric tally: SW 7 · WSM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWSM(lower P/E)
GrowthSW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSW(higher dividend yield)
QualityWSM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SW | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 64.11 | 25.55● |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.20 |
| P/S ratio | 0.82● | 3.47 |
| P/B ratio | 1.37● | 14.63 |
| PEG ratio | 0.43● | 42.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.58● | 15.51 |
| FCF yield | 4.13%● | 4.01% |
Profitability
| Metric | SW | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 18.42% | 46.06%● |
| Operating margin | 6.24% | 17.97%● |
| Net margin | 1.23% | 13.81%● |
| ROE | 2.06% | 58.22%● |
| ROIC | 3.59% | 28.83%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SW | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.94%● | 1.33% |
| Payout ratio | 135.01% | 33.93% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SW | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.07%● | 1.55% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -16.43% | 15.25%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -3.68% | -3.21%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.97% | 25.65%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SW or WSM?
- It depends on your goal. value: WSM (lower P/E); growth: SW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SW (higher dividend yield); quality: WSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WSM leads 9 to 7.
- Is SW or WSM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WSM is cheaper: SW trades at a 64.11 P/E and WSM at 25.55.
- Which has grown faster, SW or WSM?
- Over the past five years, SW grew revenue faster — SW at a 24.07% CAGR versus WSM at 1.55%.
- Does SW or WSM pay a bigger dividend?
- SW yields 3.94% and WSM yields 1.33% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SW or WSM more profitable?
- WSM runs the higher net margin — SW at 1.23% versus WSM at 13.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, SW or WSM?
- Over the past 10-year, WSM delivered the higher annualized total return — SW at 5.19% versus WSM at 26.95%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Smurfit Westrock P/E ratioWilliams-Sonoma P/E ratioSmurfit Westrock dividend yieldWilliams-Sonoma dividend yieldSmurfit Westrock ROEWilliams-Sonoma ROESmurfit Westrock operating marginWilliams-Sonoma operating marginSmurfit Westrock revenue growthWilliams-Sonoma revenue growthSmurfit Westrock free cash flowWilliams-Sonoma free cash flow
Smurfit Westrock & Williams-Sonoma appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.