Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) vs Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN)
STZ leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Constellation Brands, Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$143.38Consumer Defensive
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
$57.42Consumer Defensive
Total return — STZ vs TSN
growth of $100 · last 30ySTZ +3539.1%TSN +214.6%STZ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
STZ TSN
STZ vs TSN: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($24.59B vs $20.44B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.95 vs 44.51 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 0.81% net margin).
- •TSN grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.15% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •TSN pays the higher dividend yield (3.54% vs 2.85%).
Which is better, STZ or TSN?
Metric tally: STZ 10 · TSN 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthTSN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTSN(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | STZ | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.95● | 44.51 |
| Forward P/E | 11.55● | 14.20 |
| P/S ratio | 2.72 | 0.36● |
| P/B ratio | 3.08 | 1.12● |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.41 | 10.93● |
| FCF yield | 7.20%● | 6.04% |
Profitability
| Metric | STZ | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.67%● | 6.55% |
| Operating margin | 31.33%● | 2.30% |
| Net margin | 18.46%● | 0.81% |
| ROE | 20.87%● | 2.50% |
| ROIC | 10.48%● | 3.05% |
Dividends
| Metric | STZ | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.85% | 3.54%● |
| Payout ratio | 42.52% | 149.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | STZ | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.19% | 5.15%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.59%● | -20.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -1.57%● | -16.69% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -6.92% | -1.90%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, STZ or TSN?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: TSN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TSN (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 10 to 6.
- Is STZ or TSN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: STZ trades at a 14.95 P/E and TSN at 44.51.
- Which has grown faster, STZ or TSN?
- Over the past five years, TSN grew revenue faster — STZ at a 1.19% CAGR versus TSN at 5.15%.
- Does STZ or TSN pay a bigger dividend?
- STZ yields 2.85% and TSN yields 3.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is STZ or TSN more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — STZ at 18.46% versus TSN at 0.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, STZ or TSN?
- Over the past 10-year, TSN delivered the higher annualized total return — STZ at 0.72% versus TSN at 1.56%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Constellation Brands P/E ratioTyson Foods P/E ratioConstellation Brands dividend yieldTyson Foods dividend yieldConstellation Brands ROETyson Foods ROEConstellation Brands operating marginTyson Foods operating marginConstellation Brands revenue growthTyson Foods revenue growthConstellation Brands free cash flowTyson Foods free cash flow
Constellation Brands & Tyson Foods appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.