Snap Inc. (SNAP) vs Toyota Motor Corporation (TM)

A side-by-side comparison of Snap Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: SNAP is classified in Communication Services; TM is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnSNAP vs TM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
SNAP -76.8% (-13.6%/yr)TM +132.3% (+8.8%/yr)TM compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001kStart $1002019202120232025$23$232
SNAP TM

SNAP vs TM: by the numbers

  • TM is the larger company ($227.61B vs $9.65B market cap).
  • TM is profitable (8.60% net margin) while SNAP runs a net loss (-4.90%).
  • SNAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.71% vs 3.43% CAGR).
  • TM pays a dividend (3.03% yield), while SNAP has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricSNAPTM
P/E ratioN/A8.49
P/S ratio1.520.68
P/B ratio5.011.00
EV / EBITDAN/A10.89
FCF yield7.31%N/A

Profitability

MetricSNAPTM
Gross margin57.31%16.74%
Operating margin-5.10%7.05%
Net margin-4.90%8.60%
ROE-16.15%12.69%
ROIC-5.19%3.53%

Dividends

MetricSNAPTM
Dividend yieldN/A3.03%
Payout ratioN/A26.50%

Growth (annualized)

MetricSNAPTM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)13.71%3.43%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A6.33%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-40.22%5.25%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, SNAP or TM?
Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — SNAP at a 13.71% CAGR versus TM at 3.43%.
Does SNAP or TM pay a bigger dividend?
TM pays a dividend (3.03% yield), while SNAP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is SNAP or TM more profitable?
TM runs the higher net margin — SNAP at -4.90% versus TM at 8.60%.
How have SNAP and TM total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, SNAP delivered -40.22% and TM delivered 5.25% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.