Is SNA or VLTO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: SNA trades at a 20.71 P/E and VLTO at 22.30.

Which has grown faster, SNA or VLTO?

Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — SNA at a 5.87% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.

Does SNA or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?

SNA yields 2.36% and VLTO yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is SNA or VLTO more profitable?

SNA runs the higher net margin — SNA at 19.99% versus VLTO at 17.33%.

Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) vs Veralto Corporation (VLTO)

SNA leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Snap-on Incorporated and Veralto Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — SNA vs VLTO

growth of $100 · last 3y

SNA +57.9%VLTO +10.2%SNA compounded faster

SNA VLTO

SNA vs VLTO: by the numbers

•VLTO is the larger company ($21.81B vs $20.77B market cap).
•SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 22.30 P/E).
•SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 17.33% net margin).
•SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.87% vs 4.82% CAGR).
•SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.36% vs 0.56%).

Which is better, SNA or VLTO?

Metric tally: SNA 10 · VLTO 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSNA(lower P/E)

GrowthSNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSNA(higher dividend yield)

QualityVLTO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	SNA	VLTO
P/E ratio	20.71●	22.30
Forward P/E	20.98	20.33●
P/S ratio	4.13	3.85●
P/B ratio	3.55●	7.16
PEG ratio	1.87●	2.11
EV / EBITDA	13.82●	16.62
FCF yield	5.10%●	4.84%

Profitability

Metric	SNA	VLTO
Gross margin	51.30%	59.86%●
Operating margin	24.71%●	23.12%
Net margin	19.99%●	17.33%
ROE	17.18%	32.25%●
ROIC	13.79%	16.15%●

Dividends

Metric	SNA	VLTO
Dividend yield	2.36%●	0.56%
Payout ratio	48.46%	12.66%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SNA	VLTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.87%●	4.82%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.05%●	5.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.58%	1.00%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.53%	—

Frequently asked

Which is better, SNA or VLTO?: It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: SNA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SNA (higher dividend yield); quality: VLTO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 10 to 6.
Is SNA or VLTO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: SNA trades at a 20.71 P/E and VLTO at 22.30.
Which has grown faster, SNA or VLTO?: Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — SNA at a 5.87% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.
Does SNA or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?: SNA yields 2.36% and VLTO yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is SNA or VLTO more profitable?: SNA runs the higher net margin — SNA at 19.99% versus VLTO at 17.33%.

Go deeper

Full SNA analysis Full VLTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Snap-on P/E ratio Veralto P/E ratio Snap-on dividend yield Veralto dividend yield Snap-on ROE Veralto ROE Snap-on operating margin Veralto operating margin Snap-on revenue growth Veralto revenue growth Snap-on free cash flow Veralto free cash flow

Snap-on & Veralto appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.