Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) vs Veralto Corporation (VLTO)
A side-by-side comparison of Snap-on Incorporated and Veralto Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$416.35IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
VLTO
Veralto Corporation
$98.34IndustrialsAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — SNA vs VLTO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3ySNA +76.3%VLTO +23.5%SNA compounded faster
SNA VLTO
SNA vs VLTO: by the numbers
- •VLTO is the larger company ($23.97B vs $21.54B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.24 vs 24.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (20.37% vs 17.35% net margin).
- •SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.42% vs 4.82% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.27% vs 0.51%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SNA | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.24 | 24.83 |
| Forward P/E | 21.78 | 22.62 |
| P/S ratio | 4.32 | 4.24 |
| P/B ratio | 3.63 | 7.80 |
| PEG ratio | 1.92 | 2.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.48 | 18.50 |
| FCF yield | 4.78% | 4.33% |
Profitability
| Metric | SNA | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.21% | 60.18% |
| Operating margin | 23.78% | 22.74% |
| Net margin | 20.37% | 17.35% |
| ROE | 17.11% | 31.90% |
| ROIC | 13.79% | 16.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | SNA | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 0.51% |
| Payout ratio | 48.46% | 13.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SNA | VLTO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.42% | 4.82% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.06% | 5.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.01% | 1.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.12% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, SNA or VLTO?
- SNA has the lower trailing P/E: SNA trades at 21.24 and VLTO at 24.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, SNA or VLTO?
- Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — SNA at a 5.42% CAGR versus VLTO at 4.82%.
- Does SNA or VLTO pay a bigger dividend?
- SNA yields 2.27% and VLTO yields 0.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SNA or VLTO more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — SNA at 20.37% versus VLTO at 17.35%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Snap-on P/E ratioVeralto P/E ratioSnap-on dividend yieldVeralto dividend yieldSnap-on ROEVeralto ROESnap-on operating marginVeralto operating marginSnap-on revenue growthVeralto revenue growthSnap-on free cash flowVeralto free cash flow
Snap-on & Veralto appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 9, 2026.