SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) vs Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)
SN leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though WSM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of SharkNinja, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SN
SharkNinja, Inc.
$152.83Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
$223.34Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT
Total return — SN vs WSM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3ySN +267.4%WSM +261.0%SN compounded faster
SN WSM
SN vs WSM: by the numbers
- •WSM is the larger company ($26.30B vs $21.63B market cap).
- •WSM trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.58 vs 31.16 P/E).
- •WSM converts more revenue to profit (13.81% vs 10.70% net margin).
- •SN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.38% vs -1.36% CAGR).
- •WSM pays a dividend (1.20% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.
Which is better, SN or WSM?
Metric tally: SN 8 · WSM 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWSM(lower P/E)
GrowthSN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityWSM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.16 | 25.58● |
| Forward P/E | 25.12● | 26.23 |
| P/S ratio | 3.34● | 3.47 |
| P/B ratio | 7.96● | 14.65 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39● | 42.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.45 | 15.53● |
| FCF yield | 1.72% | 4.00%● |
Profitability
| Metric | SN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.71%● | 46.06% |
| Operating margin | 14.37% | 17.97%● |
| Net margin | 10.70% | 13.81%● |
| ROE | 25.51% | 58.22%● |
| ROIC | 19.72% | 28.83%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.20% |
| Payout ratio | — | 30.58% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SN | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 18.38%● | -1.36% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.16%● | 15.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.34%● | -3.21% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 25.52% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SN or WSM?
- It depends on your goal. value: WSM (lower P/E); growth: SN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SN leads 8 to 7.
- Is SN or WSM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WSM is cheaper: SN trades at a 31.16 P/E and WSM at 25.58.
- Which has grown faster, SN or WSM?
- Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — SN at a 18.38% CAGR versus WSM at -1.36%.
- Does SN or WSM pay a bigger dividend?
- WSM pays a dividend (1.20% yield) while SN does not currently pay one.
- Is SN or WSM more profitable?
- WSM runs the higher net margin — SN at 10.70% versus WSM at 13.81%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
SharkNinja P/E ratioWilliams-Sonoma P/E ratioSharkNinja dividend yieldWilliams-Sonoma dividend yieldSharkNinja ROEWilliams-Sonoma ROESharkNinja operating marginWilliams-Sonoma operating marginSharkNinja revenue growthWilliams-Sonoma revenue growthSharkNinja free cash flowWilliams-Sonoma free cash flow
SharkNinja & Williams-Sonoma appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.