Is SN or ULTA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ULTA is cheaper: SN trades at a 26.83 P/E and ULTA at 17.68.

Which has grown faster, SN or ULTA?

Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — SN at a 18.38% CAGR versus ULTA at 12.93%.

Is SN or ULTA more profitable?

SN runs the higher net margin — SN at 10.70% versus ULTA at 9.36%.

SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) vs Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA)

ULTA leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of SharkNinja, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

SharkNinja, Inc.

$18.83B

$133.09Consumer Cyclical

ULTA

Ulta Beauty, Inc.

$20.28B

$471.65Consumer Cyclical

Total return — SN vs ULTA

growth of $100 · last 3y

SN +214.6%ULTA +6.0%SN compounded faster

SN ULTA

SN vs ULTA: by the numbers

•ULTA is the larger company ($20.28B vs $18.83B market cap).
•ULTA trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.68 vs 26.83 P/E).
•SN converts more revenue to profit (10.70% vs 9.36% net margin).
•SN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.38% vs 12.93% CAGR).

Which is better, SN or ULTA?

Metric tally: SN 7 · ULTA 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueULTA(lower P/E)

GrowthSN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityULTA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	SN	ULTA
P/E ratio	26.83	17.68●
Forward P/E	19.02	14.78●
P/S ratio	2.88	1.63●
P/B ratio	6.86●	8.03
PEG ratio	0.39●	22.87
EV / EBITDA	17.90	12.63●
FCF yield	2.00%	5.06%●

Profitability

Metric	SN	ULTA
Gross margin	48.71%●	39.33%
Operating margin	14.37%●	12.54%
Net margin	10.70%●	9.36%
ROE	25.51%	46.06%●
ROIC	19.72%	22.76%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SN	ULTA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.38%●	12.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.16%	52.49%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.34%●	0.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	—	7.23%

Frequently asked

Which is better, SN or ULTA?: It depends on your goal. value: ULTA (lower P/E); growth: SN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ULTA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ULTA leads 8 to 7.
Is SN or ULTA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ULTA is cheaper: SN trades at a 26.83 P/E and ULTA at 17.68.
Which has grown faster, SN or ULTA?: Over the past five years, SN grew revenue faster — SN at a 18.38% CAGR versus ULTA at 12.93%.
Is SN or ULTA more profitable?: SN runs the higher net margin — SN at 10.70% versus ULTA at 9.36%.

Go deeper

Full SN analysis Full ULTA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

SharkNinja P/E ratio Ulta Beauty P/E ratio SharkNinja dividend yield Ulta Beauty dividend yield SharkNinja ROE Ulta Beauty ROE SharkNinja operating margin Ulta Beauty operating margin SharkNinja revenue growth Ulta Beauty revenue growth SharkNinja free cash flow Ulta Beauty free cash flow

SharkNinja & Ulta Beauty appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.