NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) vs Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN)
TRN leads on 6 of 9 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of NuScale Power Corporation and Trinity Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
$7.72IndustrialsAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
TRN
Trinity Industries, Inc.
$36.47IndustrialsAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — SMR vs TRN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6ySMR -22.4%TRN +100.0%TRN compounded faster
SMR TRN
SMR vs TRN: by the numbers
- •TRN is the larger company ($2.90B vs $2.30B market cap).
- •TRN is profitable (12.37% net margin) while SMR runs a net loss (-2066.55%).
- •SMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (120.81% vs 3.77% CAGR).
- •TRN pays a dividend (3.35% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, SMR or TRN?
Metric tally: SMR 3 · TRN 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSMR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityTRN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SMR | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 11.69 |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.69 |
| P/S ratio | 67.71 | 1.45● |
| P/B ratio | 1.08● | 2.77 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 12.57 |
Profitability
| Metric | SMR | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.31%● | 27.01% |
| Operating margin | -2190.57% | 16.59%● |
| Net margin | -2066.55% | 12.37%● |
| ROE | -33.06% | 23.66%● |
| ROIC | -61.76% | 3.46%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SMR | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 3.35% |
| Payout ratio | — | 38.98% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SMR | TRN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 120.81%● | 3.77% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 19.40% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -8.79% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -5.02% | 11.25%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SMR or TRN?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SMR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TRN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRN leads 6 to 3.
- Which has grown faster, SMR or TRN?
- Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — SMR at a 120.81% CAGR versus TRN at 3.77%.
- Does SMR or TRN pay a bigger dividend?
- TRN pays a dividend (3.35% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
- Is SMR or TRN more profitable?
- TRN runs the higher net margin — SMR at -2066.55% versus TRN at 12.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, SMR or TRN?
- Over the past 5-year, TRN delivered the higher annualized total return — SMR at -5.02% versus TRN at 12.97%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
NuScale Power P/E ratioTrinity Industries P/E ratioNuScale Power dividend yieldTrinity Industries dividend yieldNuScale Power ROETrinity Industries ROENuScale Power operating marginTrinity Industries operating marginNuScale Power revenue growthTrinity Industries revenue growthNuScale Power free cash flowTrinity Industries free cash flow
NuScale Power & Trinity Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 18, 2026.