Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
VRT leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though SMEGF is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Siemens Energy AG and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — SMEGF vs VRT
growth of $100 · last 6ySMEGF +655.0%VRT +1911.0%VRT compounded faster
SMEGF VRT
SMEGF vs VRT: by the numbers
- •SMEGF is the larger company ($165.54B vs $137.50B market cap).
- •SMEGF trades at the lower earnings multiple (64.93 vs 89.94 P/E).
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 6.15% net margin).
- •VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 7.98% CAGR).
- •SMEGF pays the higher dividend yield (0.42% vs 0.06%).
Which is better, SMEGF or VRT?
Metric tally: SMEGF 8 · VRT 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSMEGF(lower P/E)
GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityVRT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SMEGF | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 64.93● | 89.94 |
| Forward P/E | 32.40● | 40.70 |
| P/S ratio | 3.58● | 12.94 |
| P/B ratio | 13.51● | 33.07 |
| PEG ratio | 1.32 | 0.28● |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.02● | 60.77 |
| FCF yield | 4.23%● | 1.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | SMEGF | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 18.82% | 36.16%● |
| Operating margin | 7.96% | 18.54%● |
| Net margin | 6.15% | 14.37%● |
| ROE | 23.20% | 36.71%● |
| ROIC | 9.12% | 18.55%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SMEGF | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.42%● | 0.06% |
| Payout ratio | 36.48% | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SMEGF | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.98% | 18.86%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 45.13% | 79.41%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 47.34%● | 41.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 45.05% | 68.02%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SMEGF or VRT?
- It depends on your goal. value: SMEGF (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRT leads 9 to 8.
- Is SMEGF or VRT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SMEGF is cheaper: SMEGF trades at a 64.93 P/E and VRT at 89.94.
- Which has grown faster, SMEGF or VRT?
- Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — SMEGF at a 7.98% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
- Does SMEGF or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- SMEGF yields 0.42% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SMEGF or VRT more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — SMEGF at 6.15% versus VRT at 14.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, SMEGF or VRT?
- Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — SMEGF at 45.05% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Siemens Energy AG P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldSiemens Energy AG ROEVertiv ROESiemens Energy AG operating marginVertiv operating marginSiemens Energy AG revenue growthVertiv revenue growthSiemens Energy AG free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Siemens Energy AG & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.