Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VRT leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though SMEGF is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Siemens Energy AG and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total return — SMEGF vs VRT

growth of $100 · last 6y
SMEGF +655.0%VRT +1911.0%VRT compounded faster
05001k2k2kStart $100202120222023202420252026$755$2,011
SMEGF VRT

SMEGF vs VRT: by the numbers

  • SMEGF is the larger company ($165.54B vs $137.50B market cap).
  • SMEGF trades at the lower earnings multiple (64.93 vs 89.94 P/E).
  • VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 6.15% net margin).
  • VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 7.98% CAGR).
  • SMEGF pays the higher dividend yield (0.42% vs 0.06%).

Which is better, SMEGF or VRT?

Metric tally: SMEGF 8 · VRT 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSMEGF(lower P/E)
GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityVRT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricSMEGFVRT
P/E ratio64.9389.94
Forward P/E32.4040.70
P/S ratio3.5812.94
P/B ratio13.5133.07
PEG ratio1.320.28
EV / EBITDA29.0260.77
FCF yield4.23%1.65%

Profitability

MetricSMEGFVRT
Gross margin18.82%36.16%
Operating margin7.96%18.54%
Net margin6.15%14.37%
ROE23.20%36.71%
ROIC9.12%18.55%

Dividends

MetricSMEGFVRT
Dividend yield0.42%0.06%
Payout ratio36.48%6.45%

Growth (annualized)

MetricSMEGFVRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)7.98%18.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)45.13%79.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)47.34%41.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)45.05%68.02%

Frequently asked

Which is better, SMEGF or VRT?
It depends on your goal. value: SMEGF (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRT leads 9 to 8.
Is SMEGF or VRT cheaper?
On trailing earnings, SMEGF is cheaper: SMEGF trades at a 64.93 P/E and VRT at 89.94.
Which has grown faster, SMEGF or VRT?
Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — SMEGF at a 7.98% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
Does SMEGF or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
SMEGF yields 0.42% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is SMEGF or VRT more profitable?
VRT runs the higher net margin — SMEGF at 6.15% versus VRT at 14.37%.
Which has been the better investment, SMEGF or VRT?
Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — SMEGF at 45.05% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.