Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)
UNP leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Siemens Energy AG and Union Pacific Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SMEGF
Siemens Energy AG
$196.13Industrials
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
$256.88Industrials
Total return — SMEGF vs UNP
growth of $100 · last 6ySMEGF +665.1%UNP +30.8%SMEGF compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
SMEGF UNP
SMEGF vs UNP: by the numbers
- •SMEGF is the larger company ($167.76B vs $152.51B market cap).
- •UNP trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.16 vs 65.80 P/E).
- •UNP converts more revenue to profit (29.20% vs 6.15% net margin).
- •SMEGF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.98% vs 5.05% CAGR).
- •UNP pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 0.42%).
Which is better, SMEGF or UNP?
Metric tally: SMEGF 7 · UNP 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUNP(lower P/E)
GrowthSMEGF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUNP(higher dividend yield)
QualityUNP(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SMEGF | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 65.80 | 21.16● |
| Forward P/E | 32.61 | 18.71● |
| P/S ratio | 3.63● | 6.17 |
| P/B ratio | 13.69 | 7.85● |
| PEG ratio | 1.32● | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.43 | 14.01● |
| FCF yield | 4.18%● | 3.74% |
Profitability
| Metric | SMEGF | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 18.82% | 45.67%● |
| Operating margin | 7.96% | 40.09%● |
| Net margin | 6.15% | 29.20%● |
| ROE | 23.20% | 37.15%● |
| ROIC | 9.12% | 11.70%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SMEGF | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 2.15%● |
| Payout ratio | 36.48% | 45.96% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SMEGF | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.98%● | 5.05% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 45.13%● | 8.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 47.34%● | 0.04% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 45.66%● | 5.99% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SMEGF or UNP?
- It depends on your goal. value: UNP (lower P/E); growth: SMEGF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: UNP (higher dividend yield); quality: UNP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UNP leads 10 to 7.
- Is SMEGF or UNP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UNP is cheaper: SMEGF trades at a 65.80 P/E and UNP at 21.16.
- Which has grown faster, SMEGF or UNP?
- Over the past five years, SMEGF grew revenue faster — SMEGF at a 7.98% CAGR versus UNP at 5.05%.
- Does SMEGF or UNP pay a bigger dividend?
- SMEGF yields 0.42% and UNP yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SMEGF or UNP more profitable?
- UNP runs the higher net margin — SMEGF at 6.15% versus UNP at 29.20%.
- Which has been the better investment, SMEGF or UNP?
- Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — SMEGF at 45.66% versus UNP at 13.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Siemens Energy AG P/E ratioUnion Pacific P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldUnion Pacific dividend yieldSiemens Energy AG ROEUnion Pacific ROESiemens Energy AG operating marginUnion Pacific operating marginSiemens Energy AG revenue growthUnion Pacific revenue growthSiemens Energy AG free cash flowUnion Pacific free cash flow
Siemens Energy AG & Union Pacific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.