Which has grown faster, SJM or TAP?

Over the past five years, TAP grew revenue faster — SJM at a 2.49% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.

Does SJM or TAP pay a bigger dividend?

SJM yields 3.78% and TAP yields 4.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Which has been the better investment, SJM or TAP?

Over the past 10-year, SJM delivered the higher annualized total return — SJM at 1.00% versus TAP at -6.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)

TAP leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The J. M. Smucker Company and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

SJM

The J. M. Smucker Company

$12.42B

$116.49Consumer Defensive

TAP

Molson Coors Beverage Company

$7.80B

$41.58Consumer Defensive

Total return — SJM vs TAP

growth of $100 · last 30y

SJM +480.7%TAP +368.2%SJM compounded faster

SJM TAP

SJM vs TAP: by the numbers

•SJM is the larger company ($12.42B vs $7.80B market cap).
•Both run net losses; SJM's is the smaller (-1.53% vs -18.85% net margin).
•TAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.44% vs 2.49% CAGR).
•TAP pays the higher dividend yield (4.57% vs 3.78%).

Which is better, SJM or TAP?

Metric tally: SJM 5 · TAP 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthTAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeTAP(higher dividend yield)

QualitySJM(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	SJM	TAP
Forward P/E	11.69	8.37●
P/S ratio	1.37	0.70●
P/B ratio	2.24	0.78●
EV / EBITDA	36.76	—
FCF yield	9.30%	14.81%●

Profitability

Metric	SJM	TAP
Gross margin	33.53%	37.83%●
Operating margin	3.98%●	-20.28%
Net margin	-1.53%●	-18.85%
ROE	-2.50%●	-20.98%
ROIC	2.53%●	-10.20%

Dividends

Metric	SJM	TAP
Dividend yield	3.78%	4.57%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SJM	TAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.49%	3.44%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.57%	36.85%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.68%	1.73%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.30%●	-4.04%

Frequently asked

Which is better, SJM or TAP?: It depends on your goal. growth: TAP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TAP (higher dividend yield); quality: SJM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TAP leads 9 to 5.
Which has grown faster, SJM or TAP?: Over the past five years, TAP grew revenue faster — SJM at a 2.49% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.
Does SJM or TAP pay a bigger dividend?: SJM yields 3.78% and TAP yields 4.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Which has been the better investment, SJM or TAP?: Over the past 10-year, SJM delivered the higher annualized total return — SJM at 1.00% versus TAP at -6.34%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full SJM analysis Full TAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

SJM & TAP appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.