Which has grown faster, SIMO or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 14.30% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.

Does SIMO or WULF pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is SIMO or WULF more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 22.06% versus WULF at -1179.94%.

How have SIMO and WULF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, SIMO delivered 20.14% and WULF delivered 6.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 15, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$9.02B

$268.90TechnologyAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$8.61B

$17.38TechnologyAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — SIMO vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

SIMO +525.4% (+20.1%/yr)WULF +79.8% (+6.0%/yr)SIMO compounded faster over this window

SIMO WULF

SIMO vs WULF: by the numbers

•SIMO is the larger company ($9.02B vs $8.61B market cap).
•SIMO is profitable (22.06% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.75% vs 14.30% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	SIMO	WULF
P/E ratio	7.87	N/A
Forward P/E	24.03	N/A
P/S ratio	1.74	51.10
P/B ratio	2.19	57.32
EV / EBITDA	9.18	N/A
FCF yield	0.29%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	SIMO	WULF
Gross margin	48.87%	56.40%
Operating margin	16.31%	-101.10%
Net margin	22.06%	-1179.94%
ROE	27.68%	-1323.42%
ROIC	9.22%	-3.18%

Dividends

Metric	SIMO	WULF
Dividend yield	0.74%	N/A
Payout ratio	13.70%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SIMO	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.30%	73.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.85%	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-42.22%	-2.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	31.74%	-2.43%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, SIMO or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 14.30% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
Does SIMO or WULF pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is SIMO or WULF more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 22.06% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
How have SIMO and WULF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, SIMO delivered 20.14% and WULF delivered 6.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full SIMO analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology ROE TeraWulf ROE Silicon Motion Technology operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Silicon Motion Technology & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 15, 2026.