Which has grown faster, SIMO or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Does SIMO or WULF pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.60% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.

Is SIMO or WULF more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, SIMO or WULF?

Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 24.33% versus WULF at 10.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

SIMO leads on 8 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 1, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

Total return — SIMO vs WULF

growth of $100 · last 21y

SIMO +3074.6%WULF +337.9%SIMO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

SIMO WULF

SIMO vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($11.71B vs $10.75B market cap).
•SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.60% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.

Which is better, SIMO or WULF?

Metric tally: SIMO 8 · WULF 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	SIMO	WULF
P/E ratio	25.96	—
Forward P/E	37.80	—
P/S ratio	3.16●	62.17
P/B ratio	3.37●	69.93
PEG ratio	0.17	—
EV / EBITDA	21.08	—
FCF yield	0.22%	—

Profitability

Metric	SIMO	WULF
Gross margin	48.09%	50.93%●
Operating margin	12.77%●	-101.10%
Net margin	16.02%●	-611.46%
ROE	18.76%●	-470.94%
ROIC	9.22%●	-3.18%

Dividends

Metric	SIMO	WULF
Dividend yield	0.60%	—
Payout ratio	13.70%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SIMO	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.49%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.85%●	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-42.15%	26.65%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	42.03%●	9.78%

Frequently asked

Which is better, SIMO or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 8 to 3.
Which has grown faster, SIMO or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Does SIMO or WULF pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.60% yield) while WULF does not currently pay one.
Is SIMO or WULF more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, SIMO or WULF?: Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 24.33% versus WULF at 10.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full SIMO analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology ROE TeraWulf ROE Silicon Motion Technology operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Silicon Motion Technology & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 1, 2026.