SIM Acquisition Corp. I (SIMA) vs LendingTree, Inc. (TREE)

A side-by-side comparison of SIM Acquisition Corp. I and LendingTree, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — SIMA vs TREE

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
SIMA +11.4% (+5.6%/yr)TREE -57.7% (-35.0%/yr)SIMA compounded faster over this window
406080100120Start $10020252026$111$42
SIMA TREE

SIMA vs TREE: by the numbers

  • •SIMA is the larger company ($349M vs $345M market cap).
  • •TREE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (1.92 vs 48.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •TREE is profitable (14.32% net margin) while SIMA runs a net loss (0.00%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricSIMATREE
P/E ratio48.511.92
Forward P/EN/A4.62
P/S ratioN/A0.27
P/B ratio65.611.08

Profitability

MetricSIMATREE
Gross margin0.00%N/A
Operating margin0.00%8.32%
Net margin0.00%14.32%
ROE125.58%56.63%
ROIC-22.19%N/A

LendingTree, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Growth (annualized)

MetricSIMATREE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A5.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-28.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, SIMA or TREE?
TREE has the lower trailing P/E: SIMA trades at 48.51 and TREE at 1.92. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Is SIMA or TREE more profitable?
TREE runs the higher net margin — SIMA at 0.00% versus TREE at 14.32%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.