The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)
A side-by-side comparison of The Sherwin-Williams Company and Verisk Analytics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: SHW is classified in Basic Materials; VRSK is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$354.27Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$212.26TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — SHW vs VRSK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17ySHW +1873.1%VRSK +698.7%SHW compounded faster
SHW VRSK
SHW vs VRSK: by the numbers
- •SHW is the larger company ($87.38B vs $27.81B market cap).
- •SHW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.41 vs 31.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •VRSK converts more revenue to profit (29.34% vs 10.86% net margin).
- •SHW grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.87% vs 1.92% CAGR).
- •SHW pays the higher dividend yield (0.97% vs 0.92%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SHW | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.41 | 31.46 |
| Forward P/E | 27.83 | 26.96 |
| P/S ratio | 3.39 | 9.01 |
| P/B ratio | 18.32 | 92.99 |
| PEG ratio | 4.66 | 3.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.17 | 18.83 |
| FCF yield | 3.58% | 4.03% |
Profitability
| Metric | SHW | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.12% | 67.44% |
| Operating margin | 16.13% | 44.87% |
| Net margin | 10.86% | 29.34% |
| ROE | 58.66% | 293.95% |
| ROIC | 15.21% | 19.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | SHW | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | 30.64% | 29.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SHW | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.87% | 1.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 6.74% | 8.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -2.44% | 4.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.54% | 2.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, SHW or VRSK?
- SHW has the lower trailing P/E: SHW trades at 31.41 and VRSK at 31.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, SHW or VRSK?
- Over the past five years, SHW grew revenue faster — SHW at a 4.87% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.
- Does SHW or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?
- SHW yields 0.97% and VRSK yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SHW or VRSK more profitable?
- VRSK runs the higher net margin — SHW at 10.86% versus VRSK at 29.34%.
- How have SHW and VRSK total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, SHW delivered 13.93% and VRSK delivered 9.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Sherwin-Williams P/E ratioVerisk Analytics P/E ratioSherwin-Williams dividend yieldVerisk Analytics dividend yieldSherwin-Williams ROEVerisk Analytics ROESherwin-Williams operating marginVerisk Analytics operating marginSherwin-Williams revenue growthVerisk Analytics revenue growthSherwin-Williams free cash flowVerisk Analytics free cash flow
Sherwin-Williams & Verisk Analytics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.