Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) vs The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM)
SFD leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Smithfield Foods, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
$25.62Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
$113.97Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — SFD vs SJM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1ySFD +33.9%SJM +16.8%SFD compounded faster
SFD SJM
SFD vs SJM: by the numbers
- •SJM is the larger company ($12.18B vs $10.08B market cap).
- •SFD is profitable (6.48% net margin) while SJM runs a net loss (-1.53%).
- •SJM grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.49% vs 0.92% CAGR).
- •SFD pays the higher dividend yield (4.39% vs 4.04%).
Which is better, SFD or SJM?
Metric tally: SFD 10 · SJM 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSJM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSFD(higher dividend yield)
QualitySFD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SFD | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.01 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.67● | 12.08 |
| P/S ratio | 0.65● | 1.29 |
| P/B ratio | 1.47● | 2.10 |
| PEG ratio | 2.42 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.64● | 17.48 |
| FCF yield | 8.05% | 9.94%● |
Profitability
| Metric | SFD | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 13.44% | 33.53%● |
| Operating margin | 8.62%● | 3.98% |
| Net margin | 6.48%● | -1.53% |
| ROE | 14.69%● | -2.50% |
| ROIC | 9.58%● | 2.53% |
Dividends
| Metric | SFD | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.39%● | 4.04% |
| Payout ratio | 44.82% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SFD | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.92% | 2.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.75% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.08%● | -1.68% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 0.28% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SFD or SJM?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SJM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SFD (higher dividend yield); quality: SFD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SFD leads 10 to 3.
- Which has grown faster, SFD or SJM?
- Over the past five years, SJM grew revenue faster — SFD at a 0.92% CAGR versus SJM at 2.49%.
- Does SFD or SJM pay a bigger dividend?
- SFD yields 4.39% and SJM yields 4.04% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SFD or SJM more profitable?
- SFD runs the higher net margin — SFD at 6.48% versus SJM at -1.53%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Smithfield Foods P/E ratioJ. M. Smucker P/E ratioSmithfield Foods dividend yieldJ. M. Smucker dividend yieldSmithfield Foods ROEJ. M. Smucker ROESmithfield Foods operating marginJ. M. Smucker operating marginSmithfield Foods revenue growthJ. M. Smucker revenue growthSmithfield Foods free cash flowJ. M. Smucker free cash flow
Smithfield Foods & J. M. Smucker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.