Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of Sezzle Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnSEZL vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
SEZL +3003.0% (+77.3%/yr)WULF +448.2% (+32.8%/yr)SEZL compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1101001k10kStart $100202120222023202420252026$3,103$548
SEZL WULF

SEZL vs WULF: by the numbers

  • WULF is the larger company ($7.61B vs $4.17B market cap).
  • SEZL is profitable (30.35% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
  • WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.75% vs 42.22% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricSEZLWULF
P/E ratio27.10N/A
Forward P/E23.66N/A
P/S ratio8.1345.14
P/B ratio18.5650.62

Profitability

MetricSEZLWULF
Gross margin90.80%50.93%
Operating margin40.39%-101.10%
Net margin30.35%-1179.94%
ROE69.29%-1323.42%

Growth (annualized)

MetricSEZLWULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)42.22%73.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A-27.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)59.53%-9.63%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, SEZL or WULF?
Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — SEZL at a 42.22% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
Is SEZL or WULF more profitable?
SEZL runs the higher net margin — SEZL at 30.35% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
How have SEZL and WULF total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, SEZL delivered 59.53% and WULF delivered 5.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 30, 2026.