Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) vs Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ)

A side-by-side comparison of Vivid Seats Inc. and Scienjoy Holding Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — SEAT vs SJ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
SEAT -98.3% (-49.3%/yr)SJ -85.7% (-27.7%/yr)SJ compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1101001kStart $100202120222023202420252026$2$14
SEAT SJ

SEAT vs SJ: by the numbers

  • •SJ is the larger company ($37M vs $35M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; SJ's is the smaller (-46.37% vs -60.26% net margin).
  • •SEAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.11% vs -3.33% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricSEATSJ
P/S ratio0.070.21
P/B ratioN/A0.41

Profitability

MetricSEATSJ
Gross margin65.96%17.91%
Operating margin-10.61%-6.58%
Net margin-60.26%-46.37%
ROEN/A-90.41%
ROIC-17.52%-13.06%

Growth (annualized)

MetricSEATSJ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)31.11%-3.33%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-55.75%-25.09%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, SEAT or SJ?
Over the past five years, SEAT grew revenue faster — SEAT at a 31.11% CAGR versus SJ at -3.33%.
How have SEAT and SJ total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, SEAT delivered -55.75% and SJ delivered -25.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.