Which has the lower trailing P/E, SCOR or TRT?

SCOR has the lower trailing P/E: SCOR trades at 0.63 and TRT at 88.32. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, SCOR or TRT?

Over the past five years, TRT grew revenue faster — SCOR at a 0.08% CAGR versus TRT at 7.99%.

Is SCOR or TRT more profitable?

TRT runs the higher net margin — SCOR at -5.06% versus TRT at 1.29%.

How have SCOR and TRT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, SCOR delivered -39.03% and TRT delivered 13.31% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

comScore Inc. (SCOR) vs Trio-Tech International (TRT)

A side-by-side comparison of comScore Inc. and Trio-Tech International across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

SCOR

comScore Inc.

$63M

$4.15TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:30 PM EDT

TRT

Trio-Tech International

$61M

$6.05TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:30 PM EDT

Total return — SCOR vs TRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

SCOR -99.3% (-38.9%/yr)TRT +257.0% (+13.6%/yr)TRT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

SCOR TRT

SCOR vs TRT: by the numbers

•SCOR is the larger company ($63M vs $61M market cap).
•SCOR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (0.63 vs 88.32 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TRT is profitable (1.29% net margin) while SCOR runs a net loss (-5.06%).
•TRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.99% vs 0.08% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	SCOR	TRT
P/E ratio	0.63	88.32
Forward P/E	N/A	24.20
P/S ratio	0.18	1.28
P/B ratio	0.70	1.36
EV / EBITDA	3.50	20.18
FCF yield	22.12%	2.76%

Profitability

Metric	SCOR	TRT
Gross margin	38.20%	0.00%
Operating margin	-2.38%	-0.43%
Net margin	-5.06%	1.29%
ROE	-9.80%	1.37%
ROIC	-3.88%	-0.41%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SCOR	TRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.08%	7.99%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	26.24%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-43.67%	22.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, SCOR or TRT?: SCOR has the lower trailing P/E: SCOR trades at 0.63 and TRT at 88.32. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, SCOR or TRT?: Over the past five years, TRT grew revenue faster — SCOR at a 0.08% CAGR versus TRT at 7.99%.
Is SCOR or TRT more profitable?: TRT runs the higher net margin — SCOR at -5.06% versus TRT at 1.29%.
How have SCOR and TRT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, SCOR delivered -39.03% and TRT delivered 13.31% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full SCOR analysis Full TRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

comScore P/E ratio Trio-Tech International P/E ratio comScore ROE Trio-Tech International ROE comScore operating margin Trio-Tech International operating margin comScore revenue growth Trio-Tech International revenue growth comScore free cash flow Trio-Tech International free cash flow

comScore & Trio-Tech International appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.