Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)
A side-by-side comparison of Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Union Pacific Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
$20.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
$307.41IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — RYCEY vs UNP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yRYCEY +115.5% (+8.0%/yr)UNP +297.0% (+14.8%/yr)UNP compounded faster over this window
RYCEY UNP
RYCEY vs UNP: by the numbers
- •UNP is the larger company ($182.62B vs $172.00B market cap).
- •RYCEY trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.89 vs 24.91 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •UNP converts more revenue to profit (28.85% vs 26.94% net margin).
- •RYCEY grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.71% vs 4.32% CAGR).
- •UNP pays the higher dividend yield (1.79% vs 0.39%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RYCEY | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.89 | 24.91 |
| Forward P/E | 47.84 | 23.54 |
| P/S ratio | 6.13 | 7.19 |
| P/B ratio | 45.95 | 8.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.16 | 16.76 |
| FCF yield | 2.83% | 3.56% |
Profitability
| Metric | RYCEY | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.12% | 59.38% |
| Operating margin | 16.82% | 39.93% |
| Net margin | 26.94% | 28.85% |
| ROE | 209.94% | 35.46% |
| ROIC | 15.14% | 11.65% |
Dividends
| Metric | RYCEY | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 1.79% |
| Payout ratio | 8.77% | 45.96% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RYCEY | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.71% | 4.32% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 8.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 26.55% | -0.41% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 68.17% | 9.22% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, RYCEY or UNP?
- RYCEY has the lower trailing P/E: RYCEY trades at 14.89 and UNP at 24.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, RYCEY or UNP?
- Over the past five years, RYCEY grew revenue faster — RYCEY at a 12.71% CAGR versus UNP at 4.32%.
- Does RYCEY or UNP pay a bigger dividend?
- RYCEY yields 0.39% and UNP yields 1.79% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is RYCEY or UNP more profitable?
- UNP runs the higher net margin — RYCEY at 26.94% versus UNP at 28.85%.
- How have RYCEY and UNP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, RYCEY delivered 7.98% and UNP delivered 14.95% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Rolls-Royce P/E ratioUnion Pacific P/E ratioRolls-Royce dividend yieldUnion Pacific dividend yieldRolls-Royce ROEUnion Pacific ROERolls-Royce operating marginUnion Pacific operating marginRolls-Royce revenue growthUnion Pacific revenue growthRolls-Royce free cash flowUnion Pacific free cash flow
Rolls-Royce & Union Pacific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.